Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Maternal complications including psychological and mental health problems and neonatal morbidity have been commonly observed in the postpartum period. Home visits by health professionals or lay supporters in the weeks following the birth may prevent health problems from becoming chronic with long-term effects on women, their babies, and their families. OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes for women and babies of different home-visiting schedules during the early postpartum period. The review focuses on the frequency of home visits, the duration (when visits ended) and intensity, and on different types of home-visiting interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 January 2013) and reference lists of retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-RCTs) comparing different types of home-visiting interventions enrolling participants in the early postpartum period (up to 42 days after birth). We excluded studies in which women were enrolled and received an intervention during the antenatal period (even if the intervention continued into the postnatal period) and studies recruiting only women from specific high-risk groups. (e.g. women with alcohol or drug problems). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study eligibility was assessed by at least two review authors. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were carried out independently by at least two review authors. Data were entered into Review Manager software. MAIN RESULTS: We included data from 12 randomised trials with data for more than 11,000 women. The trials were carried out in countries across the world, and in both high- and low-resource settings. In low-resource settings women receiving usual care may have received no additional postnatal care after early hospital discharge.The interventions and control conditions varied considerably across studies with trials focusing on three broad types of comparisons: schedules involving more versus fewer postnatal home visits (five studies), schedules involving different models of care (three studies), and home versus hospital clinic postnatal check-ups (four studies). In all but two of the included studies, postnatal care at home was delivered by healthcare professionals. The aim of all interventions was broadly to assess the wellbeing of mothers and babies, and to provide education and support, although some interventions had more specific aims such as to encourage breastfeeding, or to provide practical support.For most of our outcomes only one or two studies provided data, and overall results were inconsistent.There was no evidence that home visits were associated with improvements in maternal and neonatal mortality, and no consistent evidence that more postnatal visits at home were associated with improvements in maternal health. More intensive schedules of home visits did not appear to improve maternal psychological health and results from two studies suggested that women receiving more visits had higher mean depression scores. The reason for this finding was not clear. In a cluster randomised trial comparing usual care with individualised care by midwives extended up to three months after the birth, the proportions of women with Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores ≥ 13 at four months was reduced in the individualised care group (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.86). There was some evidence that postnatal care at home may reduce infant health service utilisation in the weeks following the birth, and that more home visits may encourage more women to exclusively breastfeed their babies. There was some evidence that home visits are associated with increased maternal satisfaction with postnatal care. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of postnatal home visits may promote infant health and maternal satisfaction and more individualised care may improve outcomes for women, although overall findings in different studies were not consistent. The frequency, timing, duration and intensity of such postnatal care visits should be based upon local and individual needs. Further well designed RCTs evaluating this complex intervention will be required to formulate the optimal package.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reviews describing postpartum care in general show that factors such as the availability to a midwife and awareness of access to support have a great impact on the experience of care.
“Reviews describing postpartum care in general show that factors such as the availability to a midwife and awareness of access to support have a great impact on the experience of care [24, 25]”
From Support during the postnatal period: Evaluating new mothers' and midwives' experiences of a new, coordinated postnatal care model in a midwifery clinic in Sweden (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
The sections ‘Maternal satisfaction with care in the postnatal period’ and ‘Satisfaction with care’ report higher satisfaction with additional health-visitor support in one study and a preference for home over clinic care in two studies (page numbers unavailable). They do not establish that midwife availability or awareness of access to support has a great impact on the experience of care. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMore research is needed before any specific model of postnatal care could be recommended.
“The authors concluded that more research is needed before any specific model of postnatal care could be recommended.”
From Fulfilment of expectations on birth and the postpartum period – A Swedish cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Yonemoto, N., Dowswell, T., Nagai, S., & Mori, R.
- Affiliations
- Translational Medical Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Research Institute of Tuberculosis; Department of International Cooperation; 3-1-24 Matsuyama,Kiyose Tokyo Tokyo Japan 204-8533
- National Center For Child Health and Development (JP)
- ORCID
- Mori, Rintaro
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-02
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- CD009326-CD009326
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6483560
- OpenAlex
- W4294232692
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_version (2021-07-21)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- home visiting, postpartum period, postpartum care, maternal health, neonatal outcomes, maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, breastfeeding, maternal well-being, postpartum follow-up, resource-limited settings, postpartum depression, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum infection, lay health workers, midwives, community health workers
- MeSH terms
- Female, House Calls, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Mortality, Postnatal Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Postpartum Period, Perinatal Mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review