Cited by 78Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Cholinesterase inhibitors for rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions

Open access
Li, Ying, Hai, Shan, Zhou, Yan, Dong, Bi Rong·2015·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rarer dementias include Huntington's disease (HD), cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia in multiple sclerosis (MS) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Cholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine, are considered to be the first-line medicines for Alzheimer's disease and some other dementias, such as dementia in Parkinson's disease. Cholinesterase inhibitors are hypothesised to work by inhibiting the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) which breaks down the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Cholinesterase inhibitors may also lead to clinical improvement for rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors for cognitive impairment or dementia associated with neurological conditions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, several trial registries and grey literature sources in August 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind, controlled trials assessing the efficacy of treatment of rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions with currently marketed cholinesterase inhibitors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials, and extracted data. We used the standard methodological procedures of the Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight RCTs involving 567 participants. Six studies used a simple parallel-group design; the other two consisted of an open-label treatment period followed by a randomised phase. All trials were well concealed for allocation and double-blind, however the sample sizes of most trials were small. All trials used placebo as control. We performed meta-analyses for some outcomes in patients with MS. For all other conditions, results are presented narratively.Two trials included patients with HD; one found that cholinesterase inhibitor use in the short-term had no statistically significant impact on the cognitive portion of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog; 1 study, WMD 1.00, 95% CI -1.66 to 3.66, P = 0.46; low quality evidence), Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) Verbal Fluency Test (1 study, WMD -1.20, 95% CI -7.97 to 5.57, P = 0.73; low quality evidence), UHDRS Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; 1 study, WMD 2.70, 95% CI -0.95 to 6.35, P = 0.15; low quality evidence) and other psychometric tests. The other study found that cholinesterase inhibitor use in the medium-term improved the results of the verbal fluency test (1 study, WMD 6.43, 95% CI 0.66 to 12.20, P = 0.03; moderate quality evidence) and California Verbal Learning Test - Second Edition (CVLT-II) Recognition Task (1 study, WMD 2.42, 95% CI 0.17 to 4.67, P = 0.04; moderate quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference between groups on the SDMT (1 study, WMD -0.31, 95% CI -7.77 to 7.15, P = 0.94; moderate quality evidence), CVLT-II trials 1-5 (1 study, WMD -2.09, 95% CI -11.65 to 7.47, P = 0.67; moderate quality evidence), short-delay recall (1 study, WMD 0.35, 95% CI -2.87 to 3.57, P = 0.83; moderate quality evidence), or long-delay recall (1 study, WMD -0.14, 95% CI -3.08 to 2.80, P = 0.93; moderate quality evidence), and other psychometric tests.Four trials included patients with MS; one found no differences between the cholinesterase inhibitors (short-term) and placebo groups on the Wechsler Memory Scales general memory score (1 study, WMD 0.90, 95% CI -0.52 to 2.32, P = 0.22; low quality evidence). The three other trials found that, in the medium-term - cholinesterase inhibitors improved the clinician's impression of cognitive change (2 studies, OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.62, P = 0.03; high quality evidence). However, the treatment effect on other aspects of cognitive change were unclear, measured by the Selective Reminding Test (3 studies, WMD 1.47, 95% CI -0.39 to 3.32, P = 0.12; high quality evidence), patient's self-reported impression of memory change (2 studies, OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.93 to 3.00, P = 0.08; high quality evidence) and cognitive change (1 study, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.98, P = 0.89; high quality evidence), clinician's impression of memory change (1 study, OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.84, P = 0.39; moderate quality evidence), other psychometric tests, and activities of daily living - patient reported impact of multiple sclerosis activities (1 study, WMD -1.18, 95% CI -3.02 to 0.66, P = 0.21; low quality evidence).One study on patients with CADASIL found a beneficial effect of cholinesterase inhibitors on the Executive interview, and Trail Making Test parts A and B. The impact of cholinesterase inhibitors on the Vascular ADAS-Cog score (1 study, WMD 0.04, 95% CI -1.57 to 1.65, P = 0.96; high quality evidence),

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd009444.pub3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden.

    “The appropriate clinical distinction between fvAD and bvFTD has implications for prognosis, treatment, disease progression, and caregiver burden [11–15].”

    From Diagnosing the frontal variant of Alzheimer’s disease: a clinician’s yellow brick road (2017) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Description of the intervention section says cholinesterase inhibitors are first-line medicines for Alzheimer’s disease, while the Authors’ conclusions say their efficacy in FTD is unclear. That supports a treatment-related reason to distinguish the conditions. The review does not discuss fvAD specifically or establish implications of distinguishing it from bvFTD for prognosis, disease progression, or caregiver burden; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. De Tommaso M, Specchio N, Sciruicchio V, Difruscolo O, Specchio LM. Effects of rivastigmine on motor and cognitive impairment in Huntington's disease. Movement Disorders 2004;19(12):1516-18.
  2. de Tommaso 2007 {published data only} De Tommaso M, Difruscolo O, Sciruicchio V, Specchio N, Livrea P. Two years' follow-up of rivastigmine treatment in Huntington disease. Clinical Neuropharmacology 2007;30(1):43-6.
  3. Fabbrini G, Barbanti P, Bonifati V, Colosimo C, Gasparini M, Vanacore N, Meco G. Donepezil in the treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2001;103(2):123-5.
  4. Greene 2000 {published data only} Greene YM, Tariot PN, Wishart H, Cox C, Holt CJ, Schwid S, et al. A 12-week, open trial of donepezil hydrochloride in patients with multiple sclerosis and associated cognitive impairments. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 2000;20(3):350-6.
  5. Litvan I, Phipps M, Pharr VL, Hallett M, Grafman J, Salazar A. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 2001; Vol. 57, issue 3:467-73.
  6. Moretti 2004 {published data only} Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello RM, Cattaruzza T, Cazzato G, Bava A. Rivastigmine in frontotemporal dementia: an open-label study. Drugs & aging 2004;21(14):931-7.
  7. Baskys A, Cheng JX. Pharmacological prevention and treatment of vascular dementia: approaches and perspectives. Experimental Gerontology 2012;47(11):887-91.
  8. Brun A, Englund B, Gustafson L, Passant U, Mann DMA, Neary D, et al. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1994;57(4):416-8.
  9. Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurology 2008;7(12):1139-51.
  10. Choi JC. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy: a genetic cause Cholinesterase inhibitors for rarer dementias associated with neurological conditions (Review) Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  11. Fukutake T. Cerebral autosomal recessive arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CARASIL): from discovery to gene identification. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 2011;20(2):85-93.
  12. Hansen RA, Gartlehner G, Webb AP, Morgan LC, Moore CG, Jonas DE. Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical interventions in Aging 2008;3(2):211-25.
  13. Higgins JPT, Thompson SJ, Deeks JJ, Altman DJ. Measuring inconsistencies in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
  14. Hoppitt T, Pall H, Calvert M, Gill P, Yao G, Ramsay J, et al. A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of long- term neurological conditions in the UK. Neuroepidemiology 2011;36(1):19-28.
  15. Joutel A, Corpechot C, Ducros A, Vahedi K, Chabriat H, Mouton P, et al. Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature 1996;383(6602):707-10.
  16. Keverne JS, Low WC, Ziabreva I, Court JA, Oakley AE, Kalaria RN. Cholinergic neuronal deficits in CADASIL. Stroke 2007;38(1):188-91.
  17. Kurz A, Farlow M, Lefèvre G. Pharmacokinetics of a novel transdermal rivastigmine patch for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a review. International journal of clinical practice 2009;63(5):799-805.
  18. Lanctôt KL, Rajaram RD, Herrmann N. Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: How effective are current treatments?. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 2009;2(3):163-80.
  19. Levine DA, Langa KM. Vascular cognitive impairment: disease mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8(3):361-73.
  20. Linder J, Stenlund H, Forsgren L. Incidence of Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism in northern Sweden: a population- based study. Movement Disorders 2010;25(3):341-8.
  21. Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology 1996;47(1):1-9.
  22. Mesulam M, Siddique T, Cohen B. Cholinergic denervation in a pure multi-infarct state: observations on CADASIL. Neurology 2003;60(7):1183-5.
  23. Mollenhauer B, Forstl H, Deuschl G, Storch A, Oertel W, Trenkwalder C. Lewy body and parkinsonian dementia: common, but o en misdiagnosed conditions. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 2010;107(39):684-91.
  24. Narayan SK, Gorman G, Kalaria RN, Ford GA, Chinnery PF. The minimum prevalence of CADASIL in northeast England. Neurology 2012;78(13):1025-7.
  25. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51(6):1546-54.
  26. Nunnemann S, Kurz A, Leucht S, Diehl-Schmid J. Caregivers of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a review of burden, problems, needs, and interventions. International Psychogeriatrics/IPA 2012;24(9):1368-86.
  27. Odawara T, Shiozaki K, Iseki E, Hino H, Kosaka K. Alterations of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in atypical Pick's disease without Pick bodies. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2003;74(7):965-7.
  28. Paulsen JS. Cognitive impairment in Huntington disease: diagnosis and treatment. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2011;11(5):474-83. References to other published versions of this review Chabriat 1995
  29. Chabriat H, Vahedi K, Iba-Zizen MT, Joutel A, Nibbio A, Nagy TG, et al. Clinical spectrum of CADASIL: a study of 7 families. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Lancet 1995;346(8980):934-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Hai, S., Zhou, Y., & Dong, B. R.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-03
Volume
2015
Issue
3
Pages
CD009444-CD009444
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1941226907
Cited by
78
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
cholinesterase inhibitors, Huntington's disease, CADASIL, frontotemporal dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, acetylcholinesterase inhibition, donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, cognitive impairment, drug safety and efficacy, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, vascular dementia
MeSH terms
Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Huntington Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nootropic Agents, CADASIL, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review