Cited by 52Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationSinusitis and nasal conditionsRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

Capsaicin for non-allergic rhinitis

Open access
Gevorgyan, Artur, Segboer, Christine, Gorissen, Rob, van Drunen, Cornelis M, Fokkens, Wytske·2015·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are many forms of rhinitis. Patients are diagnosed with non-allergic rhinitis when anatomic, infectious and allergic aetiologies have been excluded. The symptoms, including nasal congestion, blockage or obstruction, clear rhinorrhoea, sneezing and, less frequently, nasal itching, can range from mild to debilitating. It affects between 25% and 50% of patients with rhinitis. Several medications are widely used in the treatment of non-allergic rhinitis, including oral and topical nasal antihistamines, intranasal and (rarely) systemic corticosteroids, and anticholinergics. Capsaicin, the active component of chili peppers, delivered intranasally, is considered a treatment option for non-allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of capsaicin in the management of non-allergic rhinitis compared with no therapy, placebo or other topical or systemic medications, or two or more of the above therapies in combination, or different capsaicin regimens. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 5); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 24 June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in adult patients with non-allergic rhinitis comparing intranasal capsaicin with no therapy, placebo or other topical or systemic medications, or their combinations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: We included four studies (five publications) involving 302 participants with idiopathic non-allergic rhinitis. All the included studies described patients with moderately severe, idiopathic non-allergic rhinitis who were between the ages of 16 and 65. Studies had follow-up periods ranging from four to 38 weeks. The overall risk of bias in the studies was either high or unclear (two studies had overall high risk of bias, while two others had low to unclear risk of bias). Using the GRADE system we assessed the evidence as being of low to moderate quality. A meta-analysis was not possible, given lack of similarity of the reported outcomes.Two studies compared capsaicin with placebo. One study reported that capsaicin resulted in an improvement of overall nasal symptoms (a primary outcome) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 to 10. There was a mean difference (MD) of -3.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.24 to -1.44), MD -3.73 (95% CI -5.45 to -2.01) and MD -3.52 (95% CI -5.55 to -1.48) at two, 12 and 36 weeks post-treatment, respectively. Another study reported that, compared to placebo, capsaicin (at 4 µg/puff) was more likely to produce overall symptom resolution (reduction in nasal blockage, sneezing/itching/coughing and nasal secretion measured with a daily record chart) at four weeks post-treatment (a primary outcome). The risk ratio (RR) was 3.17 (95% CI 1.38 to 7.29).One study compared capsaicin to budesonide (an intranasal corticosteroid). This study found that patients treated with capsaicin had a better overall symptom score compared to those treated with budesonide (MD 2.50, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.94, VAS of 0 to 10). However, there were no differences in the individual symptom scores for headache, postnasal drip, rhinorrhoea, nasal blockage, sneezing and sore throat assessed during the last three days of a four-week treatment.One study compared two different regimens of capsaicin administration: five treatments in one day versus five treatments given every two to three days during two weeks. Using daily record charts, the study reported significant improvement of individual symptom scores for rhinorrhoea in patients treated five times per day, however numerical data were not presented. There were no improvements in the other outcomes: rhinorrhoea, nasal obstruction, sneezing and overall nasal symptoms, measured on a VAS.Finally, one of these studies also compared three doses of capsaicin (to placebo). Patients treated with a 1 µg versus 4 µg per puff dose of capsaicin had a worse daily record chart overall symptom score resolution (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.16).Only one study attempted to measure adverse effects (a primary outcome), however due to methodological issues with the assessment we are unable to draw any conclusions.We sought to include other secondary outcomes (e.g. quality of life measures, treatment dropouts, endoscopic scores, turbinate or mucosal size, cost of therapy), but none of these were measured or reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Capsaicin may be an option in the treatment of idiopathic non-allergic rhinitis. It is given in the form of brief treatments, usually during the same day. It appears to have beneficial effects on overall nasal symptoms up to 36 weeks after treatment, based on a few, small

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd010591.pub2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no evidence for capsaicin use in NO caused by allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis.

    “Although it is considered a therapeutic option in NAR, there is no evidence for its use in NO caused by AR and CRS [156,157].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [157]

    In “How the intervention might work” (page unavailable), the review reports that a separate Cochrane review found no evidence of an intranasal capsaicin effect in adults with allergic rhinitis. Its “Exclusion criteria” (page unavailable) exclude allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis, so this review does not establish the broader claim that there is no evidence for treating nasal obstruction caused by either condition. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Behrendt HJ, Germann T, Gillen C, Hatt H, Jostock R. Characterization of the mouse cold-menthol receptor TRPM8 and vanilloid receptor type-1 VR1 using a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) assay. British Journal of Pharmacology 2004;141(4):737-45.
  2. Burns P, Powe DG, Jones NS. Idiopathic rhinitis. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2012;20(1):1-8.
  3. Cheng J, Yang XN, Liu X, Zhang SP. Capsaicin for allergic rhinitis in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004460.pub2] · DOI
  4. Cuilty-Siller C, Navaro C, Cruz-Ponce J, Kuhn F. Comparative clinical and rhinomanometric response to capsaicin and ipratropium bromide in vasomotor rhinitis. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1996; Vol. 115:P110.
  5. Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J, et al. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. Journal of Otolaryngology -Head & Neck Surgery 2011;40 Suppl 2:S99-193.
  6. Ellis AK, Keith PK. Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome and related disorders. Clinical Allergy and Immunology 2007;19:87-100.
  7. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinology. Supplement 2012;50(23):1-298.
  8. Garzaro M, Pezzoli M, Landolfo V, Defilippi S, Giordano C, Pecorari G. Radiofrequency inferior turbinate reduction: long- term olfactory and functional outcomes. Otolaryngology -Head and Neck Surgery 2012;146(1):146-50.
  9. Gelardi M, Maselli Del Giudice A, Fiorella ML, Soleti P, Di Gioacchino M, Conti CM, et al. Quality of life in non-allergic rhinitis depends on the predominant inflammatory cell type. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents 2008;22(1):73-81.
  10. Georgalas C, Jovancevic L. Gustatory rhinitis. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2012;20(1):9-14.
  11. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  12. Knudsen TB, Thomsen SF, Nolte H, Backer V. A population- based clinical study of allergic and non-allergic asthma. Journal of Asthma 2009;46(1):91-4.
  13. Lacroix JS, Buvelot JM, Polla BS, Lundberg JM. Improvement of symptoms of non-allergic chronic rhinitis by local treatment with capsaicin. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 1991;21(5):595-600.
  14. Marabini S, Ciabatti PG, Polli G, Fusco BM, Geppetti P. Beneficial effects of intranasal applications of capsaicin in patients with vasomotor rhinitis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1991;248(4):191-4.
  15. Meltzer EO, Grant JA. Impact of cetirizine on the burden of allergic rhinitis. Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology 1999;83(5):455-63.
  16. Molgaard E, Thomsen SF, Lund T, Pedersen L, Nolte H, Backer V. Differences between allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in a large sample of adolescents and adults. Allergy 2007;62(9):1033-7. RevMan 2014 [Computer program] The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
  17. Robinson SR, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic vidian neurectomy. American Journal of Rhinology 2006;20(2):197-202.
  18. Rondon 2012a Rondon C, Campo P, Galindo L, Blanca-Lopez N, Cassinello MS, Rodriguez-Bada JL, et al. Prevalence and clinical relevance of local allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2012;67(10):1282-8.
  19. Sanico AM, Philip G, Proud D, Naclerio RM, Togias A. Comparison of nasal mucosal responsiveness to neuronal stimulation in non-allergic and allergic rhinitis: effects of capsaicin nasal challenge. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 1998;28(1):92-100.
  20. Schroer B, Pien LC. Nonallergic rhinitis: common problem, chronic symptoms. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2012;79(4):285-93.
  21. Stjarne P, Lundblad L, Anggard A, Hokfelt T, Lundberg JM. Tachykinins and calcitonin gene-related peptide: co-existence in sensory nerves of the nasal mucosa and effects on blood flow. Cell and Tissue Research 1989;256(3):439-46.
  22. Van Gerven L, Boeckxstaens G, Hellings P. Up-date on neuro- immune mechanisms involved in allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. Rhinology 2012;50(3):227-35.
  23. van Rijswijk JB, Blom HM, Fokkens WJ. Idiopathic rhinitis, the ongoing quest. Allergy 2005;60(12):1471-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gevorgyan, A., Segboer, C., Gorissen, R., van Drunen, C. M., & Fokkens, W.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Academic Medical Centre; Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Meibergdreef 9, A2-234, 1105 Az Amsterdam Netherlands
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-14
Volume
2015
Issue
7
Pages
CD010591-CD010591
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1718090056
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
capsaicin, non-allergic rhinitis, vasomotor rhinitis, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal symptoms, treatment effectiveness, risk of bias, placebo comparison, antihistamines, corticosteroids, anticholinergic agents, children, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Capsaicin, Humans, Middle Aged, Rhinitis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Budesonide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review