Vitamin and mineral supplementation for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in mid and late life
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamins and minerals play multiple functions within the central nervous system which may help to maintain brain health and optimal cognitive functioning. Supplementation of the diet with various vitamins and minerals has been suggested as a means of maintaining cognitive function, or even of preventing dementia, in later life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of vitamin and mineral supplementation on cognitive function in cognitively healthy people aged 40 years or more. SEARCH METHODS: We searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's (CDCIG) specialised register, as well as MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO Portal/ICTRP from inception to 26th January 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that evaluated the cognitive effects on people aged 40 years or more of any vitamin or mineral supplements taken by mouth for at least three months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments were done in duplicate. Vitamins were considered broadly in the categories of B vitamins, antioxidant vitamins, and combinations of both. Minerals were considered separately, where possible. If interventions and outcomes were considered sufficiently similar, then data were pooled. In order to separate short-term cognitive effects from possible longer-term effects on the trajectory of cognitive decline, data were pooled for various treatment durations from 3 months to 12 months and up to 10 years or more. MAIN RESULTS: In total, we included 28 studies with more than 83,000 participants. There were some general limitations of the evidence. Most participants were enrolled in studies which were not designed primarily to assess cognition. These studies often had no baseline cognitive assessment and used only brief cognitive assessments at follow-up. Very few studies assessed the incidence of dementia. Most study reports did not mention adverse events or made only very general statements about them. Only 10 studies had a mean follow-up > 5 years. Only two studies had participants whose mean age was < 60 years at baseline. The risk of bias in the included studies was generally low, other than a risk of attrition bias for longer-term outcomes. We considered the certainty of the evidence behind almost all results to be moderate or low.We included 14 studies with 27,882 participants which compared folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, or a combination of these to placebo. The majority of participants were aged over 60 years and had a history of cardio- or cerebrovascular disease. We found that giving B vitamin supplements to cognitively healthy adults, mainly in their 60s and 70s, probably has little or no effect on global cognitive function at any time point up to 5 years (SMD values from -0.03 to 0.06) and may also have no effect at 5-10 years (SMD -0.01). There were very sparse data on adverse effects or on incidence of cognitive impairment or dementia.We included 8 studies with 47,840 participants in which the active intervention was one or more of the antioxidant vitamins: ß-carotene, vitamin C or vitamin E. Results were mixed. For overall cognitive function, there was low-certainty evidence of benefit associated with ß-carotene after a mean of 18 years of treatment (MD 0.18 TICS points, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.35) and of vitamin C after 5 years to 10 years (MD 0.46 TICS points, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.78), but not at earlier time points. From two studies which reported on dementia incidence, there was low-certainty evidence of no effect of an antioxidant vitamin combination or of vitamin E, either alone or combined with selenium. One of the included studies had been designed to look for effects on the incidence of prostate cancer; it found a statistically significant increase in prostate cancer diagnoses among men taking vitamin E.One trial with 4143 participants compared vitamin D3 (400 IU/day) and calcium supplements to placebo. We found low- to moderate-certainty evidence of no effect of vitamin D3 and calcium supplements at any time-point up to 10 years on overall cognitive function (MD after a mean of 7.8 years -0.1 MMSE points, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.61) or the incidence of dementia (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.24). A pilot study with 60 participants used a higher dose of vitamin D3 (4000 IU on alternate days) and found preliminary evidence that this dose probably has no effect on cognitive function over six months.We included data from one trial of zinc and copper supplementation with 1072 participants. There was moderate-certainty evidence of little or no effect on overall cognitive function (MD 0.6 MMSE points, 95% CI -0.19 to 1.39) or on the incidence of cognitive impairment after 5 years to 10 years. A second smaller trial provided no usable data, but reported no cognitive effects of six months of supplementation with zinc gluconate.From one study with 3711 participants, there was low-certainty evidence
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Supplement use lacks evidence for preserving cognitive function or preventing dementia in middle-aged or older people.
“A systematic review and a Cochrane review including RCTs of supplements (A, B, C, D, and E; calcium, zinc, copper, and multivitamins trials, n-3 fatty acids, antioxidant vitamins, and herbs) found a lack of evidence for supplement use to preserve cognitive function or prevent dementia in middle-aged (45–64 years) or older people (aged 65 years and older).148, 149”
From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [149]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 217 · Cited by 164
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- to studies in Anand 2011 {published data only} Anand VPR, Kumar BJ, Varghese JM, Das SK. Supplementation of vitamin E improves cognitive status and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus. International Research Journal of Pharmacy 2011;2:169-72.
- Authors
- Rutjes, A. W., Denton, D. A., Di Nisio, M., Chong, L.-Y., Abraham, R. P., Al-Assaf, A. S., Anderson, J. L., Malik, M. A., Vernooij, R. W., Martínez, G., Tabet, N., & McCleery, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bern (CH)
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara; Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences; Via dei Vestini 31 Chieti Scalo Italy 66013
- Cochrane (GB)
- Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (ES)
- Universidad de Antofagasta (CL)
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-12-17
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- CD011906-CD011906
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- PMC
- PMC6353240
- OpenAlex
- W1944166998
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 217
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (13/89/22)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
- Keywords
- vitamin supplementation, vitamin and mineral supplementation, cognitive function, cognitive decline, dementia prevention, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, antioxidants, vitamin C, vitamin E, vitamin D, zinc, selenium, middle-aged and older adults, brain health, dementia incidence, adverse events, risk of bias, attrition bias, quality of evidence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Calcium, Cholecalciferol, Cognition, Copper, Dementia, Folic Acid, Humans, Middle Aged, Minerals, Selenium, Vitamin A, Vitamin B 12, Vitamin E, Vitamins, Zinc, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, beta Carotene, Dietary Supplements, Vitamin B 6, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review