Cited by 55Bone health and osteoporosis researchVitamin D Research StudiesVitamin K Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Calcium and vitamin D for increasing bone mineral density in premenopausal women

Open access
Méndez-Sánchez, Lucía, Clark, Patricia, Winzenberg, Tania M, Tugwell, Peter, Correa-Burrows, Paulina, Costello, Rebecca·2023·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a condition where bones become fragile due to low bone density and impaired bone quality. This results in fractures that lead to higher morbidity and reduced quality of life. Osteoporosis is considered a major public health concern worldwide. For this reason, preventive measurements need to be addressed throughout the life course. Exercise and a healthy diet are among the lifestyle factors that can help prevent the disease, the latter including intake of key micronutrients for bone, such as calcium and vitamin D. The evidence on whether supplementation with calcium and vitamin D improves bone mineral density (BMD) in premenopausal women is still inconclusive. In this age group, bone accrual is considered to be the goal of supplementation, so BMD is relevant for the future stages of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, alone or in combination, to increase the BMD, reduce fractures, and report the potential adverse events in healthy premenopausal women compared to placebo. SEARCH METHODS: We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search was 12 April 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: ). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Outcomes included total hip bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD, quality of life, new symptomatic vertebral fractures, new symptomatic non-vertebral fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, serious adverse events, all reported adverse events and additional withdrawals for any reason. MAIN RESULTS: = 72%; 2 studies, 541 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the isolated or combined use of calcium and vitamin D supplementation in healthy premenopausal women as a public health intervention to improve BMD in the total hip or lumbar spine, and therefore it is unlikely to have a benefit for the prevention of fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral). The evidence found suggests that there is no need for future studies in the general population of premenopausal women; however, studies focused on populations with a predisposition to diseases related to bone metabolism, or with low bone mass or osteoporosis diagnosed BMD would be useful.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd012664.pub2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants at risk of cow milk allergies might have lower T-scores and BMD values due to lower calcium intake.

    “This study revealed that participants at risk of cow milk allergies, who have lower T-scores of bones and lower BMD values, might be experiencing these conditions due to a lower intake of Ca, which is the major element in bone formation (19, 20).”

    From Impacts of people at-risk of either cow milk allergies or lactose intolerance on their daily calcium intake and bone mineral density (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The review’s “How the intervention might work” section (page unavailable) says calcium is needed for bone formation, and “Description of the intervention” identifies dairy as a source of dietary calcium. It does not examine people at risk of cow’s-milk allergy or establish that they have lower T-scores or BMD because of lower calcium intake. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 55

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Deeks JJ Higgins JP Altman DG Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022 Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  2. Dunfield, 2007, Diagnostic Performance and Cost Effectiveness of Technologies to Measure Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women. Technology Report Number 94
  3. Higgins JP Altman DG Sterne JA Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2017 Available from training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.2/
  4. Higgins JP Li T Deeks JJ Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022 Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  5. Review Manager (RevMan) Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration 2020
  6. Review Manager Web (RevMan Web) The Cochrane Collaboration 2022
  7. Sánchez, 2003, Role of calcium and vitamin D in bone health (part II), Revista Española de Enfermedades Metabolicas Oseas, 12, 16

Metadata

Authors
Méndez-Sánchez, L., Clark, P., Winzenberg, T. M., Tugwell, P., Correa-Burrows, P., & Costello, R.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (MX)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Department of Human Nutrition; Institute of Nutrition & Food Technology, University of Chile; Santiago de Chile Chile
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-27
Volume
2023
Issue
1
Pages
CD012664-CD012664
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4318264104
Cited by
55
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin K Research Studies
Keywords
calcium supplementation, vitamin D supplementation, bone mineral density, premenopausal women, osteoporosis prevention, fracture prevention, vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures, hip bone density, lumbar spine bone mineral density, adverse events, bone accrual
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Calcium, Calcium, Dietary, Cholecalciferol, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Quality of Life, Vitamin D, Vitamins, Bone Density, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Fractures, Bone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review