The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
A comparison of RNA with DNA in template-directed synthesis
Abstract
The unified `electroweak' theory of the electromagnetic and weak nuclear interactions in physics predicts a small energy difference (ΔEpv) between the left- and right-handed enantiomers of chiral molecules. Thus, electroweak theory provides one of several possible explanations for the origin of biomolecular homochirality (nature's preference for L-amino acids and D-monosaccharides). Recent systematic electroweak quantum-chemical studies find ΔEpv to be an order of magnitude larger than previously anticipated, which has sparked renewed interest in the subject. The present paper addresses, for the first time, the question of the relative stability of certain possible prebiotic precursor molecules suggested in the work of A. Eschenmoser and co-workers: aziridine-2-carbonitrile (CH2NHCHCN) and oxiranecarbonitrile (CH2OCHCN), also commonly referred to as 2-cyanoaziridine and cyanooxirane, respectively. The cis/trans-isomerization pathway of aziridine-2-carbonitrile is initially characterized by standard quantum-chemical techniques. At the highest level of theory employed, the trans-isomer is found to lie by 4.0 kJ mol−1 above its cis-counterpart. The transition state connecting the two is another 74 kJ mol−1 higher in energy. After including unscaled, harmonic zero-point energy corrections, these values change to 3.7 and 69 kJ mol−1, respectively. Using the multi-configuration linear response (MCLR) approach to electroweak quantum chemistry (R. Berger, M. Quack, J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112, 3148), the energy difference between the enantiomers of the various compounds and transition structures has been computed within the random phase approximation, a special case of the general MCLR technique. (S)-Oxiranecarbonitrile and the (R)-configurations of aziridine-2-carbonitrile are found to be energetically more stable than their mirror images at their equilibrium nuclear configurations. Use of a solvation model to approximate an aqueous environment has a modest, but consistent, effect on the computed parity-violating energies. In the present examples, solvation increases the magnitude of the parity-violating energy by ca. 10%.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This study suggests that the nonenzymatic kinetic rates for RNAs may have higher and values than for DNAs.”
From Thermodynamic Basis for the Emergence of Genomes during Prebiotic Evolution (2012) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“Prior work had found that the non-enzymatic copying of RNA differed from that of DNA in at least two respects: 1) reaction rates of RNA were higher, and 2) prominent G:U wobble pairing led to higher mutation rates in RNA.3,20,30”
From Cascade of reduced speed and accuracy after errors in enzyme-free copying of nucleic acid sequences (2013) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Another effect of local structure is that RNA polymerization reactions have a different mutation profile than the corresponding reactions with DNA, with G-U wobble pairing causing high mutation rates for RNA.20,30”
From Cascade of reduced speed and accuracy after errors in enzyme-free copying of nucleic acid sequences (2013) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“This corroborates previous observations that the G:U wobble pair is a greater source of error when copying RNA compared to the G:T wobble pair in DNA (46).”
From The prebiotic evolutionary advantage of transferring genetic information from RNA to DNA (2011) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Metadata
- Authors
- Zielinski, M., Kozlov, I. A., & Orgel, L. E.
- Venue
- Helvetica Chimica Acta
- Published
- 2000
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of RNA with DNA in template-directed synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/1522-2675(20000809)83:8
- The paper
- Zielinski, M., Kozlov, I. A., & Orgel, L. E. (2000). A comparison of RNA with DNA in template-directed synthesis. Helvetica Chimica Acta. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2675(20000809)83%3A8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.