The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection: Limits on fluid injection earthquakes
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of numerous case histories of earthquake sequences induced by fluid injection at depth reveals that the maximum magnitude appears to be limited according to the total volume of fluid injected. Similarly, the maximum seismic moment seems to have an upper bound proportional to the total volume of injected fluid. Activities involving fluid injection include (1) hydraulic fracturing of shale formations or coal seams to extract gas and oil, (2) disposal of wastewater from these gas and oil activities by injection into deep aquifers, and (3) the development of enhanced geothermal systems by injecting water into hot, low-permeability rock. Of these three operations, wastewater disposal is observed to be associated with the largest earthquakes, with maximum magnitudes sometimes exceeding 5. To estimate the maximum earthquake that could be induced by a given fluid injection project, the rock mass is assumed to be fully saturated, brittle, to respond to injection with a sequence of earthquakes localized to the region weakened by the pore pressure increase of the injection operation and to have a Gutenberg-Richter magnitude distribution with a b value of 1. If these assumptions correctly describe the circumstances of the largest earthquake, then the maximum seismic moment is limited to the volume of injected liquid times the modulus of rigidity. Observations from the available case histories of earthquakes induced by fluid injection are consistent with this bound on seismic moment. In view of the uncertainties in this analysis, however, this should not be regarded as an absolute physical limit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity
Weingarten, M., Ge, S., Godt, J. W., Bekins, B. A., & Rubinstein, J. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1345 · Cited by 568
Oklahoma’s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal
Walsh, F. R., & Zoback, M. D. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500195 · Cited by 435
Sigfusson, B., Gislason, S. R., Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Gunnlaugsson, E., Gunnarsson, I., Aradottir, E. S., Sigurdardottir, H., Mesfin, K., Alfredsson, H. A., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.022 · Cited by 162
Characterizing the Geothermal Lithium Resource at the Salton Sea
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), B., Dobson, P., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), R. P. O. G. T. O., Araya, N., Brounce, M., Busse, M., Camarillo, M., English, L., Humphreys, J., Kalderon-Asael, B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2172/2222403 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- McGarr, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1008-1019
- ISSN
- 2169-9313 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165747329
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection: Limits on fluid injection earthquakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013jb010597
- The paper
- McGarr, A. (2014). Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection: Limits on fluid injection earthquakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jb010597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.