Cited by 69Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsClimate Change and GeoengineeringMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations

Cirrus cloud susceptibility to the injection of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere

Open access
Storelvmo, T., Herger, N.·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Due to their net warming effect, cirrus clouds play a crucial role in the climate system. A recently proposed climate engineering mechanism (CEM) intends to reduce high cloud cover by seeding cirrus clouds with efficient ice nuclei (IN) and therefore cool climate. Here, the susceptibility of cirrus clouds to the injection of ice nuclei in the upper troposphere is investigated in the extended Community Atmospheric Model version 5 (CAM5). Due to large uncertainties associated with the dominant ice nucleation mechanism in cirrus clouds, different control cases were simulated. In addition to pure homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation, cases with competition between homogeneous and heterogeneous nucleation and different fractions of mineral dust active as IN were considered. Whereas seeding in the pure heterogeneous case leads to a strong warming due to overseeding, an optimal seeding IN concentration of approximately 18 l−1 was found for the other cases. For the optimal seeding concentration, a reduction in the net cloud forcing (NCF) of up to 2 W m−2 was simulated, corresponding to a strong cooling effect. To optimize the cooling and minimize the amount of seeding material, globally nonuniform seeding strategies were tested, with minimal seeding in the summer hemisphere and in the tropics. With seeding applied to less than half the globe, an even stronger reduction in the NCF was achieved. This suggests that the CEM could work for an atmosphere even with considerable heteroge…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013jd020816

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Field experiments can help in evaluating the feasibility of CCT and MCT proposals, providing empirical validation of theoretical cirrus and mixed-phase cloud microphysical responses and potential side effects.

    “Field experiments can help in evaluating the feasibility of CCT and MCT proposals, providing empirical validation of theoretical cirrus and mixed-phase cloud microphysical responses and potential side effects (NASEM, 2021; Storelvmo & Herger, 2014)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 30 · Cited by 69

Authors
Storelvmo, T., & Herger, N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-03
Volume
119
Issue
5
Pages
2375-2389
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
  • 2169-8996
OpenAlex
W1975406695
Cited by
69
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Keywords
cirrus clouds, geoengineering, cloud seeding, ice nucleation, homogeneous nucleation, heterogeneous nucleation, mineral dust, overseeding, upper troposphere, global cooling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review