Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects of SOA and brown carbon

Open access
Lin, Guangxing, Penner, Joyce E., Flanner, Mark G., Sillman, Sanford, Xu, Li, Zhou, Cheng·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Abstract

Organic aerosols (OA) play an important role in climate change. However, very few calculations of global OA radiative forcing include secondary organic aerosol (SOA) or the light-absorbing part of OA (brown carbon). Here we use a global model to assess the radiative forcing associated with the change in primary organic aerosol (POA) and SOA between present-day and preindustrial conditions in both the atmosphere and the land snow/sea ice. Anthropogenic emissions are shown to substantially influence the SOA formation rate, causing it to increase by 29 Tg/yr (93%) since preindustrial times. We examine the effects of varying the refractive indices, size distributions for POA and SOA, and brown carbon fraction in SOA. The increase of SOA exerts a direct forcing ranging from −0.12 to −0.31 W m−2 and a first indirect forcing in warm-phase clouds ranging from −0.22 to −0.29 W m−2, with the range due to different assumed SOA size distributions and refractive indices. The increase of POA since preindustrial times causes a direct forcing varying from −0.06 to −0.11 W m−2, when strongly and weakly absorbing refractive indices for brown carbon are used. The change in the total OA exerts a direct forcing ranging from −0.14 to −0.40 W m−2. The atmospheric absorption from brown carbon ranges from +0.22 to +0.57 W m−2, which corresponds to 27%~70% of the black carbon (BC) absorption predicted in the model. The radiative forcing of OA deposited in land snow and sea ice ranges from +0.0011 to +0.0031 W m−2 or as large as 24% of the forcing caused by BC in snow and ice simulated by the model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013jd021186

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Lin, G., Penner, J. E., Flanner, M. G., Sillman, S., Xu, L., & Zhou, C.
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Published
2014-06-18
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
7453-7476
ISSN
  • 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-897X
OpenAlex
W2089719850
Cited by
315
References
5
FWCI
10.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects of SOA and brown carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013jd021186
The paper
Lin, G., Penner, J. E., Flanner, M. G., Sillman, S., Xu, L., & Zhou, C. (2014). Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects of SOA and brown carbon. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd021186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.