Cited by 79Planetary Science and ExplorationRadiation Therapy and DosimetryAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

Charged particle spectra obtained with the Mars Science Laboratory Radiation Assessment Detector (MSL/RAD) on the surface of Mars

Ehresmann, Bent, Zeitlin, Cary, Hassler, Donald M., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, Robert F., Böhm, Eckart, Böttcher, Stephan, Brinza, David E., Burmeister, Sönke +6 more·2014·Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets

Abstract

The Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD)—situated inside the Mars Science Laboratory's Curiosity rover—is the first ever instrument to measure the energetic particle radiation environment on the surface of Mars. To fully understand the influence of this surface radiation field in terms of potential hazard to life, a detailed knowledge of its composition is necessary. Charged particles are a major component of this environment, both galactic cosmic rays propagating to the Martian surface and secondary particles created by interactions of these cosmic rays with the atoms of the Martian atmosphere and soil. Here we present particle fluxes for a wide range of ion species, providing detailed energy spectra in the low‐energy range (up to several hundred MeV/nucleon particle energy), and integral fluxes for higher energies. In addition to being crucial for the understanding of the hazards of this radiation to possible future manned missions to Mars, the data reported here provide valuable input for evaluating and validating particle transport models currently used to estimate the radiation environment on Mars and elsewhere in space. It is now possible for the first time to compare model results for expected surface particle fluxes with actual ground‐based measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013je004547

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 79

Authors
Ehresmann, B., Zeitlin, C., Hassler, D. M., Wimmer‐Schweingruber, R. F., Böhm, E., Böttcher, S., Brinza, D. E., Burmeister, S., Guo, J., Köhler, J., Martin, C., Posner, A., Rafkin, S., & Reitz, G.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu Kiel Kiel Germany
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Published
2014-03
Volume
119
Issue
3
Pages
468-479
ISSN
  • 2169-9097 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-9100
OpenAlex
W1974063727
Cited by
79
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Southwest Research Institute
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
  • NASA Headquarters
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
charged particle spectra, galactic cosmic rays, secondary cosmic rays, particle transport model, Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity rover

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review