Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real‐time global flood estimation using satellite‐based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model

Open access
Wu, Huan, Adler, Robert F., Tian, Yudong, Huffman, George J., Li, Hongyi, Wang, JianJian·2014·Water Resources Research

Abstract

A widely used land surface model, the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model, is coupled with a newly developed hierarchical dominant river tracing‐based runoff‐routing model to form the Dominant river tracing‐Routing Integrated with VIC Environment (DRIVE) model, which serves as the new core of the real‐time Global Flood Monitoring System (GFMS). The GFMS uses real‐time satellite‐based precipitation to derive flood monitoring parameters for the latitude band 50°N–50°S at relatively high spatial (∼12 km) and temporal (3 hourly) resolution. Examples of model results for recent flood events are computed using the real‐time GFMS (http://flood.umd.edu). To evaluate the accuracy of the new GFMS, the DRIVE model is run retrospectively for 15 years using both research‐quality and real‐time satellite precipitation products. Evaluation results are slightly better for the research‐quality input and significantly better for longer duration events (3 day events versus 1 day events). Basins with fewer dams tend to provide lower false alarm ratios. For events longer than three days in areas with few dams, the probability of detection is ∼0.9 and the false alarm ratio is ∼0.6. In general, these statistical results are better than those of the previous system. Streamflow was evaluated at 1121 river gauges across the quasi‐global domain. Validation using real‐time precipitation across the tropics (30°S–30°N) gives positive daily Nash‐Sutcliffe Coefficients for 107 out of 375 (28%) stations with a mean of 0.19 and 51% of the same gauges at monthly scale with a mean of 0.33. There were poorer results in higher latitudes, probably due to larger errors in the satellite precipitation input.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2013wr014710

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Wu, H., Adler, R. F., Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Li, H., & Wang, J.
Venue
Water Resources Research
Published
2014-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
2693-2717
ISSN
  • 0043-1397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7973
OpenAlex
W2029291795
Cited by
322
References
2
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real‐time global flood estimation using satellite‐based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2013wr014710
The paper
Wu, H., Adler, R. F., Tian, Y., Huffman, G. J., Li, H., & Wang, J. (2014). Real‐time global flood estimation using satellite‐based precipitation and a coupled land surface and routing model. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013wr014710

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.