The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The future of global water stress: An integrated assessment
Open accessAbstract
We assess the ability of global water systems, resolved at 282 assessment subregions (ASRs), to the meet water requirements under integrated projections of socioeconomic growth and climate change. We employ a water resource system (WRS) component embedded within the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) framework in a suite of simulations that consider a range of climate policies and regional hydroclimate changes out to 2050. For many developing nations, water demand increases due to population growth and economic activity have a much stronger effect on water stress than climate change. By 2050, economic growth and population change alone can lead to an additional 1.8 billion people living under at least moderate water stress, with 80% of these located in developing countries. Uncertain regional climate change can play a secondary role to either exacerbate or dampen the increase in water stress. The strongest climate impacts on water stress are observed in Africa, but strong impacts also occur over Europe, Southeast Asia, and North America. The combined effects of socioeconomic growth and uncertain climate change lead to a 1.0–1.3 billion increase of the world's 2050 projected population living with overly exploited water conditions—where total potential water requirements will consistently exceed surface water supply. This would imply that adaptive measures would be taken to meet these surface water shortfalls and include: water‐use efficiency, reduced and/or redirected consumption, recurrent periods of water emergencies or curtailments, groundwater depletion, additional interbasin transfers, and overdraw from flow intended to maintain environmental requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Cited by
Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change
Weyant, J. (2017) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rew018 · Cited by 465
Future drought risk in Africa: integrating vulnerability, climate change, and population growth
Ahmadalipour, A., Moradkhani, H., Castelletti, A., & Magliocca, N. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.278 · Cited by 318
Efficient Low-Cost Anaerobic Treatment of Wastewater Using Biochar and Woodchip Filters
Kaetzl, K., Lübken, M., Gehring, T., & Wichern, M. (2018) · Water · doi:10.3390/w10070818 · Cited by 84
Reframing the Challenge of Global Wildfire Threats to Water Supplies
Hallema, D. W., Robinne, F., & Bladon, K. D. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef000867 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosser, C. A., Strzepek, K., Gao, X., Fant, C., Blanc, É., Paltsev, S., Jacoby, H., Reilly, J., & Gueneau, A.
- Venue
- Earth's Future
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 341-361
- ISSN
- 2328-4277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159681075
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.