Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial patterns in CO 2 evasion from the global river network

Open access
Lauerwald, Ronny, Laruelle, Goulven G., Hartmann, Jens, Ciais, Philippe, Regnier, Pierre A.G.·2015·Global Biogeochemical Cycles

Abstract

CO 2 evasion from rivers ( F CO 2 ) is an important component of the global carbon budget. Here we present the first global maps of CO 2 partial pressures ( p CO 2 ) in rivers of stream orders 3 and higher and the resulting F CO 2 at 0.5° resolution constructed with a statistical model. A geographic information system based approach is used to derive a p CO 2 prediction function trained on data from 1182 sampling locations. While data from Asia and Africa are scarce and the training data set is dominated by sampling locations from the Americas, Europe, and Australia, the sampling locations cover the full spectrum from high to low latitudes. The predictors of p CO 2 are net primary production, population density, and slope gradient within the river catchment as well as mean air temperature at the sampling location ( r 2 = 0.47). The predicted p CO 2 map was then combined with spatially explicit estimates of stream surface area A river and gas exchange velocity k calculated from published empirical equations and data sets to derive the F CO 2 map. Using Monte Carlo simulations, we assessed the uncertainties of our estimates. At the global scale, we estimate an average river p CO 2 of 2400 (2019–2826) µatm and a F CO 2 of 650 (483–846) Tg C yr −1 (5th and 95th percentiles of confidence interval). Our global CO 2 evasion is substantially lower than the recent estimate of 1800 Tg C yr −1 although the training set of p CO 2 is very similar in both studies, mainly due to lower tropical p CO 2 estimates in the present study. Our maps reveal strong latitudinal gradients in p CO 2 , A river , and F CO 2 . The zone between 10°N and 10°S contributes about half of the global CO 2 evasion. Collection of p CO 2 data in this zone, in particular, for African and Southeast Asian rivers is a high priority to reduce uncertainty on F CO 2 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gb004941

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P., & Regnier, P. A. G.
Venue
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Published
2015-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
534-554
ISSN
  • 0886-6236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9224
OpenAlex
W1774242947
Cited by
370
References
2
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial patterns in CO 2 evasion from the global river network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2014gb004941
The paper
Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P., & Regnier, P. A. G. (2015). Spatial patterns in CO 2 evasion from the global river network. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gb004941

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.