Cited by 39Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchGeological and Geophysical Studies

Decadal‐scale variations in geomagnetic field intensity from ancient C ypriot slag mounds

Open access
Shaar, Ron, Tauxe, Lisa, Ben‐Yosef, Erez, Kassianidou, Vasiliki, Lorentzen, Brita, Feinberg, Joshua M., Levy, Thomas E.·2015·Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems

Abstract

Geomagnetic models based on direct observations since the 1830s show that the averaged relative change in field intensity on Earth's surface over the past 170 years is less than 4.8% per decade. It is unknown if these rates represent the typical behavior of secular variations due to insufficient temporal resolution of archaeomagnetic records from earlier periods. To address this question, we investigate two ancient slag mounds in Cyprus—Skouriotissa Vouppes (SU1, fourth to fifth centuries CE, 21 m in height), and Mitsero Kokkinoyia (MK1, seventh to fifth centuries BCE, 8 m in height). The mounds are multilayered sequences of slag and charcoals that accumulated near ancient copper production sites. We modeled the age‐height relation of the mounds using radiocarbon dates, and estimated paleointensities using Thellier‐type IZZI experiments with additional anisotropy, cooling rate, and nonlinear TRM assessments. To screen out ambiguous paleointensity interpretations, we applied strict selection criteria at the specimen/sample levels. To ensure objectivity, consistency, and robust error estimation, we employed an automatic interpretation technique and put the data available in the MagIC database. The analyses yielded two independent subcentury‐scale paleointensity time series. The MK1 data indicate relatively stable field at the time the mound accumulated. In contrast, the SU1 data demonstrate changes that are comparable in magnitude to the fastest changes inferred from geomagnetic models. We suggest that fast changes observed in the published archaeomagnetic data from the Levant are driven by two longitudinally paired regions, the Middle East and South Africa, that show unusual activity in geomagnetic models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gc005455

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 39

Authors
Shaar, R., Tauxe, L., Ben‐Yosef, E., Kassianidou, V., Lorentzen, B., Feinberg, J. M., & Levy, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Shaar, Ron
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2015-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
195-214
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148942193
Cited by
39
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF (EAR 0944137)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
geomagnetic field intensity, paleointensity, archaeomagnetism, copper production, Levant, Middle East, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review