Cited by 65Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchTree-ring climate responsesAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena

Cosmic ray event of A.D. 774-775 shown in quasi-annual10Be data from the Antarctic Dome Fuji ice core

Open access
Miyake, Fusa, Suzuki, Asami, Masuda, Kimiaki, Horiuchi, Kazuho, Motoyama, Hideaki, Matsuzaki, Hiroyuki, Motizuki, Yuko, Takahashi, Kazuya +1 more·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

14C content in tree rings and 10Be concentration records in polar ice core provide information about past cosmic ray intensities. The A.D. 774–775 cosmic ray event has been identified by 14C measurement in several tree rings from all over the world. Although the quasi-decadal 10Be Dome Fuji data in the Antarctic ice core also shows a sharp peak around A.D. 775, annual 10Be variations in the Dome Fuji core or in other cores have not been revealed. We have measured quasi-annual 10Be concentrations from approximately A.D. 763–794 in the Dome Fuji ice core, and detected a clear increase (~80% above the baseline) in 10Be concentration around A.D. 775. However, an accurate height of this increase is not straightforwardly estimated due to the background variation in 10Be concentration. The 10Be increase can be due to the same cosmic ray event as shown in the 14C content in A.D. 774–775.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gl062218

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AD 774-775 event is now considered to have been caused by an extreme solar proton event.

    “The AD 774 -775 (1175 -1176 cal BP) (Miyake et al. 2012) event is the most rapid and largest yet observed and is widely replicated (e.g. Büntgen et al. 2018) and is now considered to have been caused by an extreme solar proton event (Mekhaldi et al. 2015; Miyake et al. 2015).”

    From The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP) (2020) · cites this paper as Miyake et al. 2015

    The Conclusions (section 4; page unavailable) say the observed ¹⁰Be peak makes an extreme solar proton event a more plausible origin of the AD 775 event. That supports the proposed cause, but the claim presents it as established rather than the paper’s qualified conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Güttler, D., J. Beer, N. Bleicher, G. Boswijk, A. G. Hogg, J. G. Palmer, L. Wacker, and J. Wunder (2013), The 774/775 AD Event in the Southern Hemisphere, Annual Report of the Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, pp. 33, ETH-Zürïch, Zürich, Switzerland.

Authors
Miyake, F., Suzuki, A., Masuda, K., Horiuchi, K., Motoyama, H., Matsuzaki, H., Motizuki, Y., Takahashi, K., & Nakai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Hirosaki University (JP)
  • National Institute of Polar Research (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • RIKEN Nishina Center (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyake, Fusa
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-01-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
84-89
ISSN
0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978148719
Cited by
65
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (22340144, 22241003, 22244061, 25247082, 22244015)
  • Next Generation World-Leading Researchers (NEXT Program) (GR098)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
beryllium-10, Dome Fuji ice core, cosmic ray intensity, Antarctic ice cores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review