Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patterns of river width and surface area revealed by the satellite‐derived North American River Width data set

Allen, George H., Pavelsky, Tamlin M.·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

As hydraulic, hydrologic, and biogeochemical models evolve toward greater spatial resolution and larger extent, robust morphometric data sets are essential to constrain their results. Here we present the Landsat‐derived North American River Width (NARWidth) data set, the first fine‐resolution, continental scale river centerline and width database. NARWidth contains measurements of >2.4 × 10 5 km of rivers wider than 30 m at mean annual discharge. We find that conventional digital elevation model‐derived width data sets underestimate the abundance of wide rivers. To calculate the total surface area of North American rivers, we extrapolate the strong observed relationship between river width and total surface area at different river widths ( r 2 > 0.99 for 100–2000 m widths) to narrower rivers and streams. We conservatively estimate the total surface area of North American rivers as × 10 5 km 2 (1σ confidence intervals), values % greater than previous estimates used to evaluate greenhouse gas efflux from rivers to the atmosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2014gl062764

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, river width data is typically only available for large-scale regions using long-term records of satellite imagery.

    “Currently, river width data is typically only available for large-scale regions using long-term records of satellite imagery.”
  • Databases such as the Global Width Database for Large Rivers and the North American River Width (NARWidth) data set rely on long-term imagery records from the SRTM and Landsat missions, respectively, to represent river extents at mean flow conditions.

    “Databases such as the Global Width Database for Large Rivers [18], and the North American River Width (NARWidth) data set [19] rely on long-term imagery records from the SRTM and Landsat missions, respectively, to represent river extents at mean flow conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1002/jgrf.20113 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/wrcr.20440 · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.1196808 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/esp.2132 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03773.x · DOI
  6. 10.1038/ngeo1294 · DOI
  7. 10.1137/070710111 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1029/2009JG001202 · DOI
  9. 10.5268/IW-2.4.502 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/030913338601000101 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1317606111 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/hyp.10310 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/2014gl061099 · DOI
  14. GRDC, 2011, Long‐Term Mean Monthly Discharges and Annual Characteristics of GRDC Station
  15. 10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:edosat]2.0.co;2 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/ngeo2157 · DOI
  17. Kimbrough R. A., 2003, Water Data Report WA‐03‐1, 647
  18. 10.1002/esp.3462 · DOI
  19. 10.1029/2008eo100001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Leopold L. B., 1962, Rivers, Am. Sci., 50, 511
  21. 10.3133/pp252 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1080/01431161.2012.657370 · DOI
  23. 10.5194/hess-18-4883-2014 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/esp.403 · DOI
  25. 10.1130/0016-7606(1962)73[1025:qgoswi]2.0.co;2 · DOI
  26. 10.1029/2012wr012514 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/wrcr.20398 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0022-1694(77)90103-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/lgrs.2007.908305 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/9781118872086.ch8 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.044 · DOI
  32. Rodríguez‐Iturbe I., 2001, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self‐Organization
  33. 10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 · DOI
  35. 10.1029/96wr00752 · DOI
  36. 10.2307/1412159 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1029/TR038i006p00913 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00011-6 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/503346a · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1976.tb03964.x · DOI
  41. 10.1890/07-1288.1 · DOI
  42. 10.1130/g20738.1 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/01431160600589179 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/2013wr014664 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Zimmerman R. C., 1967, Proceedings of the Symposium on River Morphology, 255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Allen, G. H., & Pavelsky, T. M.
Affiliations
Department of Geological Sciences University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-01-28
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
395-402
ISSN
  • 0094-8276
  • 1944-8007
Cited by
160
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • NASA New Investigator Program (NNX12AQ77G)
  • NASA Terrestrial Hydrology Program (NNX14AD82G)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review