Cited by 98Solar and Space Plasma DynamicsIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extreme geomagnetic storms: Probabilistic forecasts and their uncertainties

Riley, Pete, Love, Jeffrey J.·2017·Space Weather

Abstract

Abstract Extreme space weather events are low‐frequency, high‐risk phenomena. Estimating their rates of occurrence, as well as their associated uncertainties, is difficult. In this study, we derive statistical estimates and uncertainties for the occurrence rate of an extreme geomagnetic storm on the scale of the Carrington event (or worse) occurring within the next decade. We model the distribution of events as either a power law or lognormal distribution and use (1) Kolmogorov‐Smirnov statistic to estimate goodness of fit, (2) bootstrapping to quantify the uncertainty in the estimates, and (3) likelihood ratio tests to assess whether one distribution is preferred over another. Our best estimate for the probability of another extreme geomagnetic event comparable to the Carrington event occurring within the next 10 years is 10.3% 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.9,18.7] for a power law distribution but only 3.0% 95% CI [0.6,9.0] for a lognormal distribution. However, our results depend crucially on (1) how we define an extreme event, (2) the statistical model used to describe how the events are distributed in intensity, (3) the techniques used to infer the model parameters, and (4) the data and duration used for the analysis. We test a major assumption that the data represent time stationary processes and discuss the implications. If the current trends persist, suggesting that we are entering a period of lower activity, our forecasts may represent upper limits rather than best estimates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2016sw001470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1063/1.873681 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/swe.20097 · DOI
  3. Baker D. N., 2008, Severe Space Weather Events—Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts
  4. 10.1029/96JA03759 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00128-1 · DOI
  6. Cannon P., 2013, Extreme Space Weather: Impacts on Engineered Systems and Infrastructure
  7. 10.1093/mnras/20.1.13 · DOI
  8. 10.1137/070710111 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1214/12-AOAS614 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/JZ064i012p02239 · DOI
  11. 10.1201/9780429246593 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Field E. K.Milner and2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities(2008) Forecasting California's earthquakes—What can we expect in the next 30 years? USGS Fact Sheet 2008–3027 U.S. Geol. Surv. California. · DOI
  13. 10.1029/93JA02867 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_327 · DOI
  15. 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/272 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/9781139878296 · DOI
  17. 10.1029/1999JA000319 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/S1743921305000074 · DOI
  19. Liu Y. D., 2014, Observations of an Axtreme Storm in Interplanetary Space Caused by Successive Coronal Mass Ejections, 3481
  20. 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/937 · DOI
  21. 10.1029/2012GL051431 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/2015GL064842 · DOI
  23. 10.1029/2000JA000237 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/00107510500052444 · DOI
  25. Riley P., 2012, On the probability of occurrence of extreme space weather events, The Int. J. Res. Appl., 10, S02012
  26. Riley P., 2000, The Sun and Space Weather, 24th Meeting of the IAU, Joint Discussion
  27. 10.1086/505383 · DOI
  28. 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/57 · DOI
  29. 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/105 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/PROC.1967.5493 · DOI
  31. 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/38 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/JZ071i013p03125 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.05.012 · DOI
  35. 10.2307/1912557 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riley, P., & Love, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Predictive Science (United States) (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Riley, Pete
Venue
Space Weather
Published
2017-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
53-64
ISSN
1542-7390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562647817
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 11
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Space Weather (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF's Frontiers in Earth System Dynamics (FESD)
  • NASA's Living with a Star (LWS) program
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Keywords
extreme geomagnetic storms, Carrington event, space weather forecasting, power-law distribution, lognormal distribution, forecast uncertainty, bootstrapping, likelihood ratio test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review