The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable development goals (SDGs) have set the 2030 agenda to transform our world by tackling multiple challenges humankind is facing to ensure well‐being, economic prosperity, and environmental protection. In contrast to conventional development agendas focusing on a restricted set of dimensions, the SDGs provide a holistic and multidimensional view on development. Hence, interactions among the SDGs may cause diverging results. To analyze the SDG interactions we systematize the identification of synergies and trade‐offs using official SDG indicator data for 227 countries. A significant positive correlation between a pair of SDG indicators is classified as a synergy while a significant negative correlation is classified as a trade‐off. We rank synergies and trade‐offs between SDGs pairs on global and country scales in order to identify the most frequent SDG interactions. For a given SDG, positive correlations between indicator pairs were found to outweigh the negative ones in most countries. Among SDGs the positive and negative correlations between indicator pairs allowed for the identification of particular global patterns. SDG 1 (No poverty) has synergetic relationship with most of the other goals, whereas SDG 12 (Responsible consumption and production) is the goal most commonly associated with trade‐offs. The attainment of the SDG agenda will greatly depend on whether the identified synergies among the goals can be leveraged. In addition, the highlighted trade‐offs, which constitute obstacles in achieving the SDGs, need to be negotiated and made structurally nonobstructive by deeper changes in the current strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The proof and measurement of association between two things
Spearman, C. (1904) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1412159 · Cited by 8,039
Cited by
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?
Kroll, C., Warchold, A., & Pradhan, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0335-5 · Cited by 669
Self-citationA sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda
Soergel, B., Kriegler, E., Weindl, I., Rauner, S., Dirnaichner, A., Ruhe, C., Hofmann, M., Bauer, N., Bertram, C., Bodirsky, B. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3 · Cited by 544
Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions
Lade, S. J., Steffen, W., de Vries, W., Carpenter, S. R., Donges, J. F., Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Newbold, T., Richardson, K., & Rockström, J. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0454-4 · Cited by 431
Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions
Menton, M., Larrea, C., Latorre, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Peck, M., Temper, L., & Walter, M. (2020) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8 · Cited by 405
Hydrogen economy and sustainable development goals: Review and policy insights
Falcone, P. M., Hiete, M., & Sapio, A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100506 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P.
- Venue
- Earth's Future
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1169-1179
- ISSN
- 2328-4277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2771168782
- Cited by
- 1,740
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 161.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2017ef000632
- The paper
- Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions. Earth's Future. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017ef000632
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.