Cited by 27Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareAI in cancer detection

Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology

Open access
Hewitt, Katherine J, Wiest, Isabella C, Carrero, Zunamys I, Bejan, Laura, Millner, Thomas O, Brandner, Sebastian, Kather, Jakob Nikolas·2024·The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research

Abstract

The WHO guidelines for classifying central nervous system (CNS) tumours are changing considerably with each release. The classification of CNS tumours is uniquely complex among most other solid tumours as it incorporates not just morphology, but also genetic and epigenetic features. Keeping current with these changes across medical fields can be challenging, even for clinical specialists. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to parse and process complex medical text, but their utility in neuro‐oncology has not been systematically tested. We hypothesised that LLMs can effectively diagnose neuro‐oncology cases from free‐text histopathology reports according to the latest WHO guidelines. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT‐4o, Claude‐3.5‐sonnet, and Llama3 across 30 challenging neuropathology cases, which each presented a complex mix of morphological and genetic information relevant to the diagnosis. Furthermore, we integrated these models with the latest WHO guidelines through Retrieval‐Augmented Generation (RAG) and again assessed their diagnostic accuracy. Our data show that LLMs equipped with RAG, but not without RAG, can accurately diagnose the neuropathological tumour subtype in 90% of the tested cases. This study lays the groundwork for a new generation of computational tools that can assist neuropathologists in their daily reporting practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2056-4538.70009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [2]Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI‐assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health 2023; 2: e0000198. 36812645 PMC9931230
  2. [3]Patel SB, Lam K. ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5: e107– e108. 36754724
  3. [4]Ali SR, Dobbs TD, Hutchings HA, et al. Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5: e179– e181. 36894409
  4. [6]Rao A, Kim J, Kamineni M, et al. Evaluating ChatGPT as an adjunct for radiologic decision‐making. medRxiv 2023. 10.1101/2023.02.02.23285399. PMC10733745 37356806 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Kresevic S, Giuffrè M, Ajcevic M, et al. Optimization of hepatological clinical guidelines interpretation by large language models: a retrieval augmented generation‐based framework. npj Digit Med 2024; 7: 1– 9. 38654102 PMC11039454
  6. [8]Ono D, Dickson DW, Koga S. Evaluating the efficacy of few‐shot learning for GPT‐4Vision in neurodegenerative disease histopathology: a comparative analysis with convolutional neural network model. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2024; 50: e12997. 39010256
  7. [10]Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2016–2020. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25: iv1– iv99. 37793125 PMC10550277
  8. [12]Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 18: 170– 186. 33293629 PMC7904519
  9. [13]Khalid N, Qayyum A, Bilal M, et al. Privacy‐preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: techniques and applications. Comput Biol Med 2023; 158: 106848. 37044052
  10. [14]Wiest IC, Leßmann M‐E, Wolf F, et al. Anonymizing medical documents with local, privacy preserving large language models: the LLM‐anonymizer. bioRxiv 2024. 10.1101/2024.06.11.24308355. · DOI
  11. [16]Kumar RP, Sivan V, Bachir H, et al. Can artificial intelligence mitigate missed diagnoses by generating differential diagnoses for neurosurgeons? World Neurosurg 2024; 187: e1083– e1088. 38759788
  12. [17]Zaki HA, Aoun A, Munshi S, et al. The application of large language models for radiologic decision making. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21: 1072– 1078. 38224925
  13. [18]Madadi Y, Delsoz M, Lao PA, et al. ChatGPT assisting diagnosis of neuro‐ophthalmology diseases based on case reports. medRxiv 2023. 10.1101/2023.09.13.23295508. PMC12341750 40830998 · DOI
  14. [19]Chen TC, Kaminski E, Koduri L, et al. Chat GPT as a neuro‐score calculator: analysis of a large language model's performance on various neurological exam grading scales. World Neurosurg 2023; 179: e342– e347. 37634667
  15. [20]Koga S, Martin NB, Dickson DW. Evaluating the performance of large language models: ChatGPT and Google Bard in generating differential diagnoses in clinicopathological conferences of neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Pathol 2024; 34: e13207. 37553205 PMC11006994
  16. [21]Nazario‐Johnson L, Zaki HA, Tung GA. Use of large language models to predict neuroimaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20: 1004– 1009. 37423349

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hewitt, K. J., Wiest, I. C., Carrero, Z. I., Bejan, L., Millner, T. O., Brandner, S., & Kather, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kather, Jakob Nikolas
Venue
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-11
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
e70009-e70009
ISSN
2056-4538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404093611
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Clinical Center (NIHR203331)
  • Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz (PEARL 01KD2104C, CAMINO 01EO2101, SWAG 01KD2215, TRANSFORM LIVER 031L0312A, TANGERINE 01KT2302, Come2Data 16DKZ2044A, DEEP‐HCC 031L0315A)
  • Leeds Biomedical Research Centre
  • H2020 European Research Council (NADIR 101114631)
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council (ODELIA 101057091, GENIAL 101096312)
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe (DECADE 70115166)
  • German Academic Exchange Service London (SECAI 57616814)
  • National Institutes of Health (EPICO R01 CA263318)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
large language models, neuropathology, central nervous system tumors, histopathology reports, retrieval-augmented generation, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3, neuro-oncology, diagnostic support tool
MeSH terms
Neuropathology, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Central Nervous System Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review