Cited by 28Gut microbiota and healthInflammatory Bowel DiseaseClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Fecal microbiota transplantation results in bacterial strain displacement in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

Open access
Zou, Manli, Jie, Zhuye, Cui, Bota, Wang, Honggang, Feng, Qiang, Zou, Yuanqiang, Zhang, Xiuqing, Yang, Huanming +3 more·2020·FEBS Open Bio

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which is thought to have the potential to correct dysbiosis of gut microbiota, has been used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for almost a decade. Here, we report an interventional prospective cohort study performed to elucidate the extent of and processes underlying microbiota engraftment in IBD patients after FMT treatment. The cohort included two categories of patients: (a) patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 7, n = 11) and (b) patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (Montreal classification S2 and S3, n = 4). All patients were treated with a single FMT (via mid-gut, from healthy donors), and follow-up visits were performed at baseline, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after FMT (missing time points included). At each follow-up time point, fecal samples and clinical metadata were collected. For comparative analysis, 10 fecal samples from 10 healthy donors were included to represent the diversity level of normal gut microbiota. Additionally, the metagenomic data of 25 fecal samples from five individuals with metabolic syndrome who underwent autologous FMT treatment were downloaded from a previous published paper to represent fluctuations in microbiota induced during FMT. All fecal samples underwent shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We found that 3 days after FMT, 11 out of 15 recipients were in remission (three out of four UC recipients; 8 out of 11 CD recipients). Generally, bacterial colonization was observed to be lower in CD recipients than in UC recipients at both species and strain levels. Furthermore, across species, different strains displayed disease-specific displacement advantages under two-disease status. Finally, most post-FMT species (> 80%) could be properly predicted (area under the curve > 85%) using a random forest classification model, with the gut microbiota composition and clinical parameters of pre-FMT recipients acting as factors that contribute to prediction accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2211-5463.12744

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zou et al. found relatively high predictability of the recipient microbiome after FMT (AUC > 85%) based on bacterial taxa together with host parameters.

    “Additionally, Zou et al. 146 found relatively high predictability of the recipient microbiome after FMT (AUC > 85%) based on bacterial taxa together with host parameters (e.g., immune markers and GI symptom scores).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 28

Authors
Zou, M., Jie, Z., Cui, B., Wang, H., Feng, Q., Zou, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, H., Wang, J., Zhang, F., & Jia, H.
Affiliations
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Faming
  • Jia, Huijue
Venue
FEBS Open Bio
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12-13
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
41-55
ISSN
2211-5463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981179503
Cited by
28
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Open Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670606, 81670495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
fecal microbiota transplantation, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, gut dysbiosis, remission, random forest classification
MeSH terms
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Adult, Bacteria, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review