Fecal microbiota transplantation results in bacterial strain displacement in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which is thought to have the potential to correct dysbiosis of gut microbiota, has been used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for almost a decade. Here, we report an interventional prospective cohort study performed to elucidate the extent of and processes underlying microbiota engraftment in IBD patients after FMT treatment. The cohort included two categories of patients: (a) patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥ 7, n = 11) and (b) patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) (Montreal classification S2 and S3, n = 4). All patients were treated with a single FMT (via mid-gut, from healthy donors), and follow-up visits were performed at baseline, 3 days, 1 week, and 1 month after FMT (missing time points included). At each follow-up time point, fecal samples and clinical metadata were collected. For comparative analysis, 10 fecal samples from 10 healthy donors were included to represent the diversity level of normal gut microbiota. Additionally, the metagenomic data of 25 fecal samples from five individuals with metabolic syndrome who underwent autologous FMT treatment were downloaded from a previous published paper to represent fluctuations in microbiota induced during FMT. All fecal samples underwent shotgun metagenomic sequencing. We found that 3 days after FMT, 11 out of 15 recipients were in remission (three out of four UC recipients; 8 out of 11 CD recipients). Generally, bacterial colonization was observed to be lower in CD recipients than in UC recipients at both species and strain levels. Furthermore, across species, different strains displayed disease-specific displacement advantages under two-disease status. Finally, most post-FMT species (> 80%) could be properly predicted (area under the curve > 85%) using a random forest classification model, with the gut microbiota composition and clinical parameters of pre-FMT recipients acting as factors that contribute to prediction accuracy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Zou et al. found relatively high predictability of the recipient microbiome after FMT (AUC > 85%) based on bacterial taxa together with host parameters.
“Additionally, Zou et al. 146 found relatively high predictability of the recipient microbiome after FMT (AUC > 85%) based on bacterial taxa together with host parameters (e.g., immune markers and GI symptom scores).”
From Key determinants of success in fecal microbiota transplantation: From microbiome to clinic (2023) · cites this paper as [146]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Zou, M., Jie, Z., Cui, B., Wang, H., Feng, Q., Zou, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, H., Wang, J., Zhang, F., & Jia, H.
- Affiliations
- BGI Group (China) (CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Faming
- Jia, Huijue
- ORCID
- Venue
- FEBS Open Bio
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-13
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-55
- ISSN
- 2211-5463 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6943227
- OpenAlex
- W2981179503
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- FEBS Open Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670606, 81670495)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
- Keywords
- fecal microbiota transplantation, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, gut dysbiosis, remission, random forest classification
- MeSH terms
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, Adult, Bacteria, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review