The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industrial Melanism
Abstract
Industrial melanism refers to the evolution of dark body colours in animal species that live in habitats blackened by industrial soot. The phenomenon has been documented in numerous species that hide from predators by blending in with their backgrounds. Peppered moths provide one example. Before the industrial revolution, peppered moths in the UK were pale grey, but after their habitats became polluted with soot from coal‐fired industries, melanic (black) phenotypes became numerous and spread to other regions. Away from industrial centres, the pale phenotype remained common. Following clean air legislation a century later, the atmosphere improved, soot‐damaged habitats gradually recovered, and the pale phenotype returned as the predominant form. Parallel changes have occurred in America. The melanic and pale phenotypes are determined by genes, and the changes in their percentages in populations reflect natural selection. Experiments identify bird predation on the moth phenotypes as the agent of selection. Key Concepts: The natural colour patterns of animals are adaptations produced by natural selection. A change in frequency (percentage) of genetically determined phenotypes in natural populations is direct evidence of evolutionary change. Mutations introduce new genetic variation to a population, but recurrent mutations occur too rarely to bring about rapid changes in the frequency of genes. Random changes in the frequency of genes (genetic drift) are irregular and unpredictable in direction. Directional, rapid changes in the frequency of genetically determined phenotypes in populations result from natural selection. Historical records on phenotypic frequencies from population samples allow the assessment of natural selection. Gene flow (migration) retards genetic differentiation among geographically widespread populations. Clines indicate different selection pressures along environmental gradients; when selection is removed, migration homogenises the differences along a cline. Parallel evolution is ‘nature's replicate experiment’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The peppered moth remains the type example of rapid response to human-induced environmental change, driven by selective predation.
“The peppered moth remains the type example of rapid response to human-induced environmental change, driven by selective predation (Grant, 2012).”
From The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study (2013) · cites this paper as Grant, 2012
Citations
Cites
Bishop, J. A. (1972) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3513 · Cited by 165
Clarke, C. A., & Sheppard, P. M. (1966) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1966.0075 · Cited by 105
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- Asami T, 1995, Melanism has not evolved in Japanese Biston betularia (Geometridae), Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 49, 88
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00521.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1235 · DOI · Paper page
- Clarke CA, 1994, A long term assessment of Biston betularia (L.) in one UK locality (Caldy Common near West Kirby, Wirral) 1959–1993, and glimpses elsewhere, Linnean, 10, 18
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb01555.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01215.x · DOI
- 10.1086/378925 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00794.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/hdy.2008.105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1980.tb00086.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/244278a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60105-9 · DOI
- 10.1163/187631276X00441 · DOI
- Edleston RS, 1864, Untitled, Entomologist, 2, 150
- Endler JA, 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00809.x · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/esh022 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant BS, 1999, An examination of intraseasonal variation in the incidence of melanism in peppered moths, Biston betularia (Geometridae), Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 53, 99
- 10.1093/jhered/89.5.465 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jhered/93.2.86 · DOI · Paper page
- Haldane JBS, 1924, A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 23, 19
- 10.1038/119127a0 · DOI
- Hooper J, 2002, Of Moths and Men: The Untold Story of Science and the Peppered Moth
- Kettlewell B, 1973, The Evolution of Melanism: The Study of Recurring Necessity
- 10.1038/hdy.1955.36 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/hdy.1977.42 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01985.x · DOI · Paper page
- Majerus MEN, 1998, Melanism: Evolution in Action, 10.1093/oso/9780198549833.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.00987.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00170.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1982.tb02020.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01602.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01398.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0003142 · DOI
- 10.1093/aesa/55.6.695 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0803785105 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-1751-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1181931 · DOI
- Tutt JW, 1896, British Moths
- 10.1126/science.1203043 · DOI · Paper page
- Wells J, 2000, Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What we Teach about Evolution is Wrong
- Young M, 2005, Moonshine: why the peppered moth remains an icon of evolution, Skeptical Inquirer, 29, 23
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00518.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0636 · DOI
- 10.1093/jhered/esi082 · DOI
- 10.1038/35071144 · DOI
- 10.1038/418019a · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1073593 · DOI
- Lees DR, 1981, Genetic Consequences of Man‐made Change, 129
- Mallet J, 2004, The peppered moth: a black and white story after all, Genetics Society News, 50, 34
- 10.1177/0963662505052890 · DOI
- Rudge DW, 2010, Tut‐tut Tutt, not so fast. Did Kettlewell really test Tutt's explanation of industrial melanism, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32, 493
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The peppered moth and industrial melanism: evolution of a natural selection case study
Cook, L. M., & Saccheri, I. J. (2013) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2012.92 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, B. S.
- Affiliations
- William & Mary (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grant, Bruce S
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of Life Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- OpenAlex
- W4250196036
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Keywords
- industrial melanism, peppered moth, natural selection, camouflage, phenotypic frequency, genetic drift, gene flow, clinal variation, parallel evolution, bird predation, Industrial Revolution, clean air legislation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review