Cited by 3Evolution and Genetic DynamicsAnimal Behavior and Reproductionmelanin and skin pigmentation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Industrial Melanism

Grant, Bruce S·2012·Encyclopedia of Life Sciences

Abstract

Industrial melanism refers to the evolution of dark body colours in animal species that live in habitats blackened by industrial soot. The phenomenon has been documented in numerous species that hide from predators by blending in with their backgrounds. Peppered moths provide one example. Before the industrial revolution, peppered moths in the UK were pale grey, but after their habitats became polluted with soot from coal‐fired industries, melanic (black) phenotypes became numerous and spread to other regions. Away from industrial centres, the pale phenotype remained common. Following clean air legislation a century later, the atmosphere improved, soot‐damaged habitats gradually recovered, and the pale phenotype returned as the predominant form. Parallel changes have occurred in America. The melanic and pale phenotypes are determined by genes, and the changes in their percentages in populations reflect natural selection. Experiments identify bird predation on the moth phenotypes as the agent of selection. Key Concepts: The natural colour patterns of animals are adaptations produced by natural selection. A change in frequency (percentage) of genetically determined phenotypes in natural populations is direct evidence of evolutionary change. Mutations introduce new genetic variation to a population, but recurrent mutations occur too rarely to bring about rapid changes in the frequency of genes. Random changes in the frequency of genes (genetic drift) are irregular and unpredictable in direction. Directional, rapid changes in the frequency of genetically determined phenotypes in populations result from natural selection. Historical records on phenotypic frequencies from population samples allow the assessment of natural selection. Gene flow (migration) retards genetic differentiation among geographically widespread populations. Clines indicate different selection pressures along environmental gradients; when selection is removed, migration homogenises the differences along a cline. Parallel evolution is ‘nature's replicate experiment’.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470015902.a0001788.pub3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The peppered moth remains the type example of rapid response to human-induced environmental change, driven by selective predation.

    “The peppered moth remains the type example of rapid response to human-induced environmental change, driven by selective predation (Grant, 2012).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Asami T, 1995, Melanism has not evolved in Japanese Biston betularia (Geometridae), Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 49, 88
  2. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00521.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1235 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Clarke CA, 1994, A long term assessment of Biston betularia (L.) in one UK locality (Caldy Common near West Kirby, Wirral) 1959–1993, and glimpses elsewhere, Linnean, 10, 18
  5. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb01555.x · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01215.x · DOI
  7. 10.1086/378925 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00794.x · DOI
  9. 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1136 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/hdy.2008.105 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1980.tb00086.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/244278a0 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60105-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1163/187631276X00441 · DOI
  15. Edleston RS, 1864, Untitled, Entomologist, 2, 150
  16. Endler JA, 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild
  17. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00809.x · DOI
  18. 10.1093/jhered/esh022 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Grant BS, 1999, An examination of intraseasonal variation in the incidence of melanism in peppered moths, Biston betularia (Geometridae), Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society, 53, 99
  20. 10.1093/jhered/89.5.465 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023013 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/jhered/93.2.86 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Haldane JBS, 1924, A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 23, 19
  24. 10.1038/119127a0 · DOI
  25. Hooper J, 2002, Of Moths and Men: The Untold Story of Science and the Peppered Moth
  26. Kettlewell B, 1973, The Evolution of Melanism: The Study of Recurring Necessity
  27. 10.1038/hdy.1955.36 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/hdy.1977.42 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01985.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Majerus MEN, 1998, Melanism: Evolution in Action, 10.1093/oso/9780198549833.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.00987.x · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00170.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1982.tb02020.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01602.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01398.x · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003142 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/aesa/55.6.695 · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.0803785105 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1751-5_8 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.1181931 · DOI
  41. Tutt JW, 1896, British Moths
  42. 10.1126/science.1203043 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wells J, 2000, Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What we Teach about Evolution is Wrong
  44. Young M, 2005, Moonshine: why the peppered moth remains an icon of evolution, Skeptical Inquirer, 29, 23
  45. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1990.tb00518.x · DOI
  46. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0636 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/jhered/esi082 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/35071144 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/418019a · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.1073593 · DOI
  51. Lees DR, 1981, Genetic Consequences of Man‐made Change, 129
  52. Mallet J, 2004, The peppered moth: a black and white story after all, Genetics Society News, 50, 34
  53. 10.1177/0963662505052890 · DOI
  54. Rudge DW, 2010, Tut‐tut Tutt, not so fast. Did Kettlewell really test Tutt's explanation of industrial melanism, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32, 493

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grant, B. S.
Affiliations
William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Bruce S
Venue
Encyclopedia of Life Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-15
OpenAlex
W4250196036
Cited by
3
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
industrial melanism, peppered moth, natural selection, camouflage, phenotypic frequency, genetic drift, gene flow, clinal variation, parallel evolution, bird predation, Industrial Revolution, clean air legislation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review