The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement Error Models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02296192 · Cited by 5,282
Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models
Lewbel, A. (2012) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2012.643126 · Cited by 2,712
Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis
Greenland, S. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.3.340 · Cited by 2,208
Use and misuse of the reduced major axis for line‐fitting
Smith, R. J. (2009) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.21090 · Cited by 724
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
Garland, T., Bennett, A. F., & Rezende, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01745 · Cited by 692
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuller, W. A.
- Venue
- Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-06-30
- ISSN
- 1940-6347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3143949042
- Cited by
- 2,351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement Error Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470316665
- The paper
- Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
