The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mann‐Whitney U Test
Abstract
The Mann‐Whitney U test, which is also known as the Wilcoxon rank sum test, tests for differences between two groups on a single, ordinal variable with no specific distribution (Mann & Whitney, 1947; Wilcoxon, 1945). In contrast, the independent samples t‐test, which is also a test of two groups, requires the single variable to be measured at the interval or ratio level, rather than the ordinal level, and to be normally distributed. We accordingly refer to the Mann‐Whitney U test as the nonparametric version of the parametric t‐test. Both tests require two independently sampled groups and assess whether two groups differ on a single, continuous variable. The two tests, however, differ on the assumed distribution. A nonparametric test assumes no specific distribution, whereas a parametric test assumes a specific distribution. Thus, the Mann‐Whitney U is conceptually similar to the t‐test for determining whether two sampled groups are from a single population. When data do not meet the parametric assumptions of the t‐test, the Mann‐Whitney U tends to be more appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · Cited by 14,320
Nonparametric Statistical Methods
Ramsey, P. H. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486020 · Cited by 1,673
Explaining Psychological Statistics
Cohen, B. H. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394260638 · Cited by 688
Gibbons, J. D. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985314 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Gender divide and acceptance of collaborative Web 2.0 applications for learning in higher education
Huang, W.-H. D., Hood, D. W., & Yoo, S. J. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.001 · Cited by 287
Stakeholders prioritization of climate-smart agriculture interventions: Evaluation of a framework
Khatri-Chhetri, A., Pant, A., Aggarwal, P. K., Vasireddy, V. V., & Yadav, A. (2019) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.002 · Cited by 146
Liu, M. X., Sarkar, A., Negreanu, C., Zorn, B., Williams, J., Toronto, N., & Gordon, A. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580817 · Cited by 119
Local and global explanations of agent behavior: Integrating strategy summaries with saliency maps
Huber, T., Weitz, K., André, E., & Amir, O. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103571 · Cited by 53
Quillivic, R., Gayraud, F., Auxéméry, Y., Vanni, L., Peschanski, D., Eustache, F., Dayan, J., & Mesmoudi, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-61557-7 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J.
- Venue
- The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-30
- Pages
- 1-1
- OpenAlex
- W1577581905
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 5
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mann‐Whitney U Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524
- The paper
- McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann‐Whitney U Test. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.