The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vivo NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Techniques
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
Ladd, M. E., Bachert, P., Meyerspeer, M., Moser, E., Nagel, A. M., Norris, D. G., Schmitter, S., Speck, O., Straub, S., & Zaiss, M. (2018) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001 · Cited by 544
Wilson, M., Reynolds, G., Kauppinen, R. A., Arvanitis, T. N., & Peet, A. C. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22579 · Cited by 332
13 C MRS studies of neuroenergetics and neurotransmitter cycling in humans
Rothman, D. L., De Feyter, H. M., de Graaf, R. A., Mason, G. F., & Behar, K. L. (2011) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1772 · Cited by 290
Glutamate and glutamine: a review of in vivo MRS in the human brain
Ramadan, S., Lin, A., & Stanwell, P. (2013) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3045 · Cited by 282
A Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice Produces Lasting Deficits in Brain Metabolism
Lyons, D. N., Vekaria, H., Macheda, T., Bakshi, V., Powell, D. K., Gold, B. T., Lin, A.-L., Sullivan, P. G., & Bachstetter, A. D. (2018) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.5663 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- de Graaf, R. A.
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-26
- OpenAlex
- W2500050372
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470512968
- The paper
- de Graaf, R. A. (2007). In Vivo NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Techniques. Wiley eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470512968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
