Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuber Formation in Potato: Induction, Initiation, and Growth

Open access
Ewing, E. E., Struik, P. C.·1992·Horticultural Reviews

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Methods of Studying Tuberization Environmental Factors Affecting Tuberization Genetic Effects Effects of the Mother Tuber Physiological Nature of Induction to Tuberize Changes in the Stolon Tip or Bud Associated with Tuberization Patterns of Stolon and Tuber Formation Resorption and Second Growth Implications for Tuber Yield Conclusion Literature Cited

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470650523.ch3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Ewing, E. E., & Struik, P. C.
Venue
Horticultural Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-09-30
Pages
89-198
ISSN
0163-7851 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145859359
Cited by
333
References
1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuber Formation in Potato: Induction, Initiation, and Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470650523.ch3
The paper
Ewing, E. E., & Struik, P. C. (1992). Tuber Formation in Potato: Induction, Initiation, and Growth. Horticultural Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650523.ch3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.