Single Case Quantitative Methods for Practice‐Based Evidence
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction The relevance of single case designs for practice-based evidence The methodology of the single case design: the research ideal Problems in applying the research ideal to standard clinical practice Modifying the research ideal for practice-based evidence Conclusion Acknowledgements References
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychotherapy cannot be as cleanly withdrawn as some behavioural interventions.
“Because psychotherapy aims for internalization and positive change that is maintainable, it clearly cannot be as cleanly withdrawn as some behavioural interventions can be (Kellett et al., 2021; McMillan & Morley, 2010).”
From Effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy for bipolar affective disorder: A co‐produced single subject cumulative treatment design with extended follow‐up (A <sup>1</sup> /B/A <sup>2</sup> /C‐FU) (2022) · cites this paper as McMillan & Morley, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- McMillan, D., & Morley, S.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McMillan, Dean
- Morley, Stephen
- Venue
- Developing and Delivering Practice‐Based Evidence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-08
- Pages
- 109-138
- OpenAlex
- W1557079521
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, practice-based evidence, clinical practice, evidence-based practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
