Gene–Environment Interaction: Overcoming Methodological Challenges
Abstract
While interacting biological effects of genes and environmental exposures (G x E) form a natural part of the causal framework underlying disorders of human health, the detection of G x E relies on inference from statistical interactions observed at population level. The validity of such inference has been questioned because the presence or absence of statistical interaction depends on measurement scale and statistical model. Furthermore, the feasibility of G x E research is threatened by the fact that tests of statistical interaction require large samples and their power is substantially reduced by unreliability in the assessments of genes, environmental exposures and pathology. It is demonstrated that concerns about statistical models and scaling can be addressed by integration of observational and experimental data. Judicious selection of genes and environmental factors should limit multiple testing. To overcome the challenge of low statistical power, it is suggested to maximize the reliability of measurement, integrate prior knowledge under Bayesian framework and facilitate pooling of data across studies by use of standardized stratified reporting. Consistencies and discrepancies among studies can be exploited for methodological analysis and model specification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interaction effects require larger sample sizes for adequate power, and power depends on allele frequencies and exposure to early life stress.
“Achieving sufficient statistical power presents a special challenge because interaction effects require larger numbers of subjects for adequate power (Brookes et al. 2001; Luan et al. 2001; Uher 2008), and power depends on allele frequencies in addition to exposure to ELS (Munafo et al. 2009).”
From Gene–environment interactions: early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Uher 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kapur, S., Phillips, A. G., & Insel, T. R. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.105 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Gene–environment interactions: early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders
Nugent, N. R., Tyrka, A. R., Carpenter, L. L., & Price, L. H. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-010-2151-x · Cited by 269 · see citing works
“Achieving sufficient statistical power presents a special challenge because interaction effects require larger numbers of subjects for adequate power (Brookes et al. 2001; Luan et al. 2001; Uher 2008), and power depends on allele frequencies in addition to exposure to ELS (Munafo et al.”
BackgroundGene–Environment Interactions in Severe Mental Illness
Uher, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00048 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Uher, R.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Uher, Rudolf
- ORCID
- Uher, Rudolf
- Venue
- Novartis Foundation Symposia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-30
- Volume
- 293
- Pages
- 13-30
- ISSN
- 1528-2511 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-4657
- OpenAlex
- W1580128115
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Novartis Foundation symposium (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- gene-environment interaction, statistical interaction, measurement reliability, statistical power, multiple comparisons, Bayesian analysis, pooled analysis, measurement scales, model specification
- MeSH terms
- Disease Susceptibility, Environment, Gene Frequency, Genes, Genotype, Humans, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review