The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Post‐Fordism and the State
Abstract
This chapter contains section titled: Fordism and Post-Fordism The Nature of Post-Fordism The Nature of the Consolidated Post-Fordism State Variants of the Schumpeterian Workfare State More on the Hollowing Out of the National State Conclusion Notes References
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory
Roy, A. (2009) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400701809665 · Cited by 1,317
Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling
Swyngedouw, E. (2004) · Cambridge Review of International Affairs · doi:10.1080/0955757042000203632 · Cited by 1,041
Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity1
Wacquant, L. (2010) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x · Cited by 764
Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling
Swyngedouw, E. (2000) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d9s · Cited by 578
The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality*
Sheppard, E. (2002) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00189.x · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Jessop, B.
- Venue
- Post‐Fordism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Pages
- 251-279
- OpenAlex
- W2945350532
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post‐Fordism and the State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470712726.ch8
- The paper
- Jessop, B. (1994). Post‐Fordism and the State. Post‐Fordism. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712726.ch8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
