The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In works spanning 1775–1778, Kant described four races: The race of the Whites, The Negro Race, The Hunnic (Mongolian or Kalmuck) Race (including Americans), and The Hindu or Hindustani Race (Bernasconi, 2001, 2002; Eze, 1995, 2001).”
From Skin color and race (2021) · cites this paper as Bernasconi, 2002
In the citing paper
“His writings made explicit the nature and hierarchical classification of races, and solidified the supreme position of Whites and inferior position of Blacks (Bernasconi, 2002; Eze, 1995).”
From Skin color and race (2021) · cites this paper as Bernasconi, 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jablonski, N. G. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24200 · Cited by 139
“Bernasconi (2002) has speculated that Kant did not regard Africans as fully human because they did not possess all the talents and dispositions of complete human beings.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernasconi, R.
- Corresponding author
- Bernasconi, Robert
- ORCID
- Bernasconi, Robert
- Venue
- Philosophers on Race
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Pages
- 145-166
- OpenAlex
- W1500831254
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Keywords
- Immanuel Kant, racism, Kantian ethics, ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
