The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Social Identity Through Workplace Interaction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Early corpus -based and interactional studies documented broad tendencies; men often favor object -focused discourse, while women more frequently deploy relational and interactive strategies (Cameron, 1997; Holmes, 2008; Archer, 2019).”
From Examining the linguistic and behavioural patterns of gender identity in women with dissociative identity disorder (2025) · cites this paper as Holmes, 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alotaibi, T., Almusharraf, N., & Imran, M. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05672-4 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Holmes, J.
- Corresponding author
- Holmes, Janet
- ORCID
- Holmes, Janet
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- OpenAlex
- W2497733799
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- gender, workplace communication, workplace discourse, gender inequality in employment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
