Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions

Heim, Irene·2002·Formal Semantics

Abstract

Restricting our attention to existence presuppositions resulting from dcfinite descriptions, we observe that (3) inherits the presupposition that thcre is a king, which \wth of its constituents carry, but does11't inherit the presupposition that thc king has a son, which its right constitucilt carries. The solution I will advocate was in some sense already arrived at by Karttunen (1974), but its full potcntial was not realized ilt the time, perhaps because an appropriately sophisticated view of contexl change and its rclation to truth-conditional meaning was not available then.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470758335.ch10

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Heim, I.
Venue
Formal Semantics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Pages
249-260
OpenAlex
W1509297014
Cited by
560
References
6
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9780470758335.ch10
The paper
Heim, I. (2002). On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. Formal Semantics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758335.ch10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.