Cited by 230Resilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Fostering the Future: Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology

Yates, Tuppett M., Masten, Ann S.·2004·Positive Psychology in Practice

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: A Resilience Framework Ordinary Adaptation Despite Extraordinary Circumstance: A Developmental Model of Resilience Reciprocity Between Resilience Research and the Practice of Positive Psychology Building Connections among Science, Practice, and Individuals Caveats Conclusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470939338.ch32

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yates, T. M., & Masten, A. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Positive Psychology in Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-30
Pages
521-539
OpenAlex
W1694404707
Cited by
230
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
resilience theory, positive psychology, extraordinary circumstances, science-practice integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review