Issues in the Classification of Autism and Related Conditions
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Development of Autism as a Diagnostic Concept Issues in Classification The Role of Research Approaches to Categorical Definitions of Autism DSM-III-R From ICD-9 to ICD-10 DSM-IV and ICD-10 Current Controversies in Diagnosis Conclusion
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical diagnosis in the field trial had good overall sensitivity and specificity and was highly consistent with the ICD-10 criteria current at that time.
“Clinical diagnosis demonstrated good overall sensitivity and specificity, being highly consistent with the ICD-10 criteria that were current at that time.30”
From Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (2012) · cites this paper as [30]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 173 · Cited by 251
- Authors
- Volkmar, F. R., & Klin, A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- ORCID
- Volkmar, Fred R.
- Venue
- Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-15
- Pages
- 5-41
- OpenAlex
- W1561718267
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 173
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 30
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, autism classification, diagnostic criteria, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, ICD-10, ICD-9, diagnostic controversies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
