Origin of Evolutionary Novelties
Abstract
This chapter contains section titled: Introduction Patterns Impact of novelties Generation of novelties Characters and functional evolution
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The expectation of morphological novelty differs depending on the specific drivers of an individual adaptive radiation.
“Thus, the expectation of morphological novelty differs depending on the specific drivers of an individual adaptive radiation [74–80].”
From Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life (2015) · cites this paper as [76]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 14 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Jablonski, D.
- Corresponding author
- Jablonski, D.
- ORCID
- Jablonski, D.
- Venue
- Palaeobiology II
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Pages
- 162-166
- OpenAlex
- W1522855312
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palaeobiology II (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- evolutionary innovation, character evolution, functional evolution, morphological innovation, evolutionary patterns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
