Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Socialism: Utopian and Scientific

Engels, Fredrick·2010·The Two Narratives of Political Economy

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: The Origin of Utopian Socialism The Contribution of Saint-Simon The Contribution of Fourier The Contribution of Robert Owen The Limitations of the Utopian Socialists The Decline of Metaphysics and the Emergence of Dialectics “Nature is the Proof of Dialectics” “The Hegelian System” and “German Idealism” The Emergence of “Modern Materialism” “A Decisive Change in the Conception of History” “Socialism Became a Science” “The Materialist Conception of History” “What is, then, the position of Modern Socialism?” “Anarchy Reigns in Socialized Production” The Immanent laws of the “Capitalistic Mode of Production” “The Perfecting of Machinery” “The Socialized Organization of Production” The Withering Away of the State

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118011690.ch25

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Engels, F.
Venue
The Two Narratives of Political Economy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-08
Pages
447-465
OpenAlex
W1564384902
Cited by
636
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.