Cited by 46Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Neuropsychological Assessment and Intervention for Childhood and Adolescent Disorders

Riccio, Cynthia A., Sullivan, Jeremy R., Cohen, Morris J.·2010·Wiley eBooks

Abstract

Foreword ( George W. Hynd ). Preface. Acknowledgments. About the Authors. Chapter 1 Introduction to Pediatric Neuropsychology. What Is Pediatric Neuropsychology?. Neuropsychological Assessment. Interpretation. Why Neuropsychological Assessment?. Linking Assessment to Intervention. Concluding Comments. Chapter 2 Learning Disabilities: Reading Disability/Dyslexia. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: Cord-Dyslexia. Concluding Comments. Chapter 3 Learning Disabilities: Dyscalculia/Math Disability. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: Carl-Dyscalculia. Concluding Comments. Chapter 4 Specific Language Impairment/Dysphasia. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: Naya-Dysphasia/SLI. Concluding Comments. Chapter 5 Autism Spectrum Disorders. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: John-Asperger's Disorder. Concluding Comments. Chapter 6 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: Eddie-Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Combined Type. Concluding Comments. Chapter 7 Tourette Syndrome. Definition. Etiology. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions. Case Study: Moses-Tourette Syndrome. Concluding Comments. Chapter 8 Traumatic Brain Injury. Definition. Course and Prognosis. Evidence-Based Interventions…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118269954

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problem-solving, logical reasoning, and working memory deficits were noted in children with learning disabilities in math.

    “Problem-solving, logical reasoning and WM deficits were noted in Children with learning disabilities in math (Riccio et al., 2010).”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Riccio et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riccio, C. A., Sullivan, J. R., & Cohen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-15
OpenAlex
W645256666
Cited by
46
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.70
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
child neuropsychology, neuropsychological assessment, evidence-based interventions, learning disabilities, dyslexia, dyscalculia, specific language impairment, dysphasia, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tourette syndrome, traumatic brain injury, childhood cancer, epilepsy, Landau-Kleffner syndrome, sickle cell disease, stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review