Basic Conversation Analytic Methods
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Interaction as an Object of Study: Methodological Preliminaries Steps in Developing an Analysis Conclusions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study took inspiration from conversation analysis to decide what talk should be considered a question.
“we took inspiration from conversation analysis (CA) to decide what talk should be considered as a question [11,54].”
From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 321
- Authors
- Sidnell, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sidnell, Jack
- ORCID
- Sidnell, Jack
- Venue
- The Handbook of Conversation Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-28
- Pages
- 77-99
- OpenAlex
- W1532614805
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- conversation analysis, discourse analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
