Cited by 45Biblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Antiquity StudiesClassical Philosophy and Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Josephus and Philo in Rome

Niehoff, Maren R.·2015·A Companion to Josephus

Abstract

Important insights into Flavius Josephus's role and achievements can be gained by looking at Philo of Alexandria, his famous Jewish predecessor in Rome. While Josephus started his literary career as an historian of contemporary events, which he knew from personal experience, Philo turned to historiography only at a later stage in his career. Both Jewish writers strongly identify with their people and adopt a pro-Roman attitude, and believed that divine providence proved their interpretation of contemporary politics to be the right one. A good example of Philo and Josephus sharing Stoic motifs popular in Rome is the creation of the cosmos. While the creation played hardly any role in Philo's early Alexandrian works, it became a central theme in his later Exposition. Josephus and Philo engage Stoic arguments of nature theology in order to offer a rational interpretation of the biblical creation account.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118325162.ch8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Colson F. H., 1935, Philo, Volume VI
  2. Feldman Louis H., 1998, Josephus’ Interpretation of the Bible
  3. Hicks R. D., 1925, Diogenes Laertius, Volume II
  4. Niehoff Maren R., 2011, The Roman Context of Philo's Exposition, Studia Philonica Annual, 23, 1
  5. Tcherikover Victor, 1957, Corpus Papyrorum Judaicum
  6. Thackeray Henry, St. J., 1926, Josephus. Works
  7. Van der Horst Pieter, 1984, Chaeremon, Egyptian Priest and Stoic Philosopher: The Fragments Collected and Translated
  8. Colson F. H., 1929, Philo, Volume I
  9. Runia David T., 2001, Philo of Alexandria: On the Creation of the World According to Moses. Introduction, Translation and Commentary

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Niehoff, M. R.
Corresponding author
Niehoff, Maren R.
Venue
A Companion to Josephus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-30
Pages
135-146
OpenAlex
W2493230046
Cited by
45
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 40 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
Keywords
Josephus, Philo of Alexandria, Stoicism, creation of the cosmos, expositio, natural theology, divine providence, Jewish historiography, Roman Empire, biblical creation account, Rome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review