Cited by 16EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLinguistics and Language AnalysisStudent Assessment and Feedback

The Relative Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in Classroom Interaction

Lyster, Roy·2015·The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction

Abstract

This chapter first reviews observational research conducted in second and foreign language classrooms that has identified various types of oral corrective feedback that teachers provide in response to learner errors. The chapter then reviews the relative effectiveness of the different types of corrective feedback as attested by quasi-experimental classroom research. Next, a range of variables that moderate the effectiveness of oral corrective feedback is identified to illuminate the challenges that teachers face in providing corrective feedback despite the positive outcomes of empirical studies. Specifically addressed are (a) the confounding messages conveyed by co-occurrences of positive and negative feedback, (b) the extent to which teachers focus on language in communicative discourse either incidentally or intentionally, and (c) the tensions arising from learners’ attested preferences to receive feedback relative to their teachers’ hesitations to provide it. A discourse perspective is adopted throughout to illustrate the complexity of oral corrective feedback used by teachers in ways that sustain classroom interaction and maintain its coherence, but without consistently fulfilling a corrective function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118531242.ch13

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classroom studies confirm the effectiveness of classroom corrective feedback when compared with no corrective feedback.

    “Lyster (2015) argued that classroom studies confirm the effectiveness of classroom corrective feedback when compared with no corrective feedback.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyster, R.
Corresponding author
Lyster, Roy
Venue
The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-24
Pages
213-228
OpenAlex
W1498367422
Cited by
16
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
corrective feedback, oral corrective feedback, second language classroom, foreign language classroom, student errors, positive and negative feedback, classroom interaction, discourse coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review