The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Abstract
Although individuals with dyslexia have difficulty with read-ing by definition (Snowling, 2000), they are not a homoge-neous group with respect to the nature and severity of their cognitive difficulties. A large proportion of individuals with dyslexia exhibit impairments in phoneme awareness (Chiappe,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nowicki, S., & Duke, M. P. (1994) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf02169077 · Cited by 783
MacMillan, D. L., & Reschly, D. J. (1998) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/002246699803200103 · Cited by 210
Cognitive Prediction of Reading, Math, and Attention: Shared and Unique Influences
Peterson, R. L., Boada, R., McGrath, L. M., Willcutt, E. G., Olson, R. K., & Pennington, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219415618500 · Cited by 143
Glutting (2006) · doi:10.1177/00224669060400020101 · Cited by 122
Saracoglu, B., Minden, H., & Wilchesky, M. (1989) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221948902200913 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Voress, J. K.
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of Special Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-07
- OpenAlex
- W4248638464
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781118660584.ese1301
- The paper
- Voress, J. K. (2014). Journal of Learning Disabilities. Encyclopedia of Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118660584.ese1301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
