Cited by 48Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEthics in Business and Education

Solving the trolley problem

Greene, Joshua D.·2016·A Companion to Experimental Philosophy

Abstract

The Trolley Problem arises from a set of moral dilemmas, most of which involve tradeoffs between causing one death and preventing several more deaths. The normative and descriptive Trolley Problems are closely related. The normative Trolley Problem begins with the assumption that authors' natural responses to these cases are generally, if not uniformly, correct. Thus, any attempt to solve the normative Trolley Problem begins with an attempt to solve the descriptive problem, to identify the features of actions that elicit their moral approval or disapproval. The chapter explains an empirical research paper to provide an approximate descriptive solution to the Trolley Problem. More specifically, this research highlights the influence of two factors that exert a powerful influence when both are present. From a normative perspective, the personal force factor is notable because it is not one that the authors ordinarily regard as morally relevant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118661666.ch11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The survey was adapted from Greene's classic trolley dilemma survey, using Yes/No options and Likert scales.

    “The experimental design was adapted from Greene’s classic survey on trolley dilemma, which employed Yes/No options to exam people’s choices and Likert scales to measure moral acceptance Greene (2016).”
  • Individuals' moral choices are notably influenced by their personal roles within a given moral dilemma.

    “Extensive research has established that individuals’ moral choices are notably influenced by their personal roles within a given moral dilemma (Hauser et al., 2007; Greene, 2016).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 42 · Cited by 48

Authors
Greene, J. D.
Corresponding author
Greene, Joshua D.
Venue
A Companion to Experimental Philosophy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-29
Pages
173-189
OpenAlex
W2498910053
Cited by
48
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
trolley problem, ethical dilemmas, moral judgment, descriptive ethics, normative ethics, killing versus letting die

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review