Cited by 34Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessClinical practice guidelines implementation

Using Reporting Guidelines Effectively to Ensure Good Reporting of Health Research

Altman, Douglas G., Simera, Iveta·2014·Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual

Abstract

This chapter examines how reporting guidelines can be used by researchers and others to improve the quality of the accumulating research literature and ultimately benefit patients. It considers whose responsibility it is to ensure good reporting of research. A reporting guideline lists the minimum set of items that should be included in a research report to provide a clear and transparent account of what was done and what was found. Researchers are the primary target group of most reporting guidelines as they benefit directly from their use both as authors and peer reviewers of research articles. However, many others can indirectly benefit from the use of reporting guidelines: readers of research articles, systematic reviewers, clinical guideline developers, research funders, journal editors and publishers, patients, and society at large. Journal editors can use reporting guidelines in several ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118715598.ch4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reporting guidelines have been shown to increase methodological transparency and uptake of research findings.

    “Reporting guidelines outline a minimum set of items to include in research reports and have been shown to increase methodological transparency and uptake of research findings (8, 9).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 18 · Cited by 34

Authors
Altman, D. G., & Simera, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-25
Pages
32-40
OpenAlex
W1574372378
Cited by
34
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
reporting guidelines, research transparency, peer review, journal editors, systematic reviews, clinical guideline development, research funding agencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review