The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary exhumations in Spain: recovering the missing from the Spanish Civil War
Abstract
In the past decade, interest has grown in Spain with regard to recovering the remains of the victims of the Civil War and the Francoist regime that followed. With the arrival of democracy in Spain in 1978, numerous exhumations were undertaken although unfortunately without technical or institutional support, and hence little information is available about them. This chapter presents a number of clandestine graves case studies, with a focus on wells, potholes and caves as these are not widely reported in the literature. The recovery of the human remains of victims in the Civil War is always a complex task that requires specialised techniques developed by archaeologists and using internationally proven methodology. Advancements in archaeological techniques in the field of Forensic Science as well as advances in other disciplines have made it possible to search, locate and recover these remains and identify the victims.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Outside cemetery walls, human remains have been found in ditches by the roadside; mass graves in field, forests; and depositions in wells, caves, mines and other locations.
“Outside cemetery walls, human remains have been found in ditches by the roadside; mass graves in field, forests; and depositions in wells, caves, mines and other locations [9,19].”
From Twenty years of forensic archaeology and anthropology of the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and Francoist Regime (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
The role of forensic science, forensic medicine, and in particular forensic archaeology and forensic anthropology has increased in investigations of Spanish Civil War victims at the request of the families of the disappeared.
“the role of forensic science, forensic medicine and in particular forensic archaeology and forensic anthropology has increased in these investigations at the request of the families of the disappeared [1,[7], [8], [9]].”
From Twenty years of forensic archaeology and anthropology of the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and Francoist Regime (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Alonso A., 2006, La Represión Franquista: Mito, Olvido y Memoria, 183
- Alonso A., 2012, La identificación genética de víctimas de la Guerra Civil Española: la experiencia del Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Boletin Galego de Medicina Legal e Forense, 18, 117
- 10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.11.008 · DOI
- Crespillo M., 2004, Guerra Civil Española (1936–1939): identificación de restos humanos procedentes de fosas comunes en Cataluña mediante análisis de ADN Mitocondrial, A propósito de un caso. Cuadernos de Medicina Forense, 38, 37
- Etxeberria F., 2004, La Memoria de los Olvidados. Un Debate Sobre el Silencio de la Represión Franquista, 183
- Etxeberria F., 2012, Boletín Galego de Medicina Legal e Forense, 18
- Herrasti Erlogorri L., 2012, Excavación arqueológica de los enterramientos colectivos de la Guerra Civil, Antropología forense de la Guerra Civil Española. Boletín Galego de Medicina Legal e Forense, 18, 29
- López García J., 2010, Fontanosas, 1941‐2006. Memoria de Carne y Hueso
- Prada E., 2003, Antropologíay Biodiversidad, 431
- Reverte J. M., 1984, Informe emitido por la escuela de medicina legal en su sección de antropología forense al Ilmo. Sr. Juez del Juzgado de instrucción no 10, Madrid. Los esqueletos de la Casa de Campos de Madrid, Anales de la Escuela de Medicina Legal de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1, 33
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.023 · DOI
- Serrulla F., 1995, Estudio antropológico forense de los restos óseos aparecidos en cova Arcoia (O Caurel, Lugo), Boletín Galego de Medicina Legal e Forense, 1, 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Etxeberria, F., González-Ruibal, A., Herrasti, L., Márquez-Grant, N., Muñoz-Encinar, L., & Ramos, J. (2021) · Forensic Science International: Synergy · doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100159 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Etxeberria, F., Herrasti, L., Serrulla, F., & Márquez‐Grant, N.
- Venue
- Forensic archaeology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-02-20
- Pages
- 489-497
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
