The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sugarcane Yields and Yield‐Limiting Processes
Abstract
A synopsis of yield-building and yield-limiting processes of sugarcane is timely given the difficulty facing many sugarcane industries in improving cane yields and sucrose %cane. Biomass and sucrose yields accumulate with the development of the leaf canopy, which progressively intercepts increasing amounts of radiation that is used in photosynthesis to produce sucrose, which, in turn, is then translocated to various sinks in the plant. The sugarcane canopy develops slowly compared to annual crops such as maize and sorghum. The outline for this chapter is based on the concepts of yield building used in most models of sugarcane and other crop production systems. This concept involves the development of the leaf canopy that progressively intercepts increasing amounts of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). This radiation is used in photosynthesis to produce sucrose, which is translocated to various sinks in the plant.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While maximum leaf area has been measured as high as 70000 mm 2 under high input glasshouse studies (Inman-Bamber, 2013), under field conditions in Australia values of 38000 mm 2 were more common (Robertson et al., 1998).”
From A theoretical and real world evaluation of two Bayesian techniques for the calibration of variety parameters in a sugarcane crop model (2016) · cites this paper as Inman-Bamber, 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- 10.1016/j.sajb.2007.04.065 · DOI
- Anonymous, 2009, World Sugar Yearbook
- 10.1071/PP9860045 · DOI
- Batchelor C.H., 1992, Influence of moisture stress on sugarcane leaf and stem extension, Revue Agricole et Sucriere de L'ile Maurice, 71, 312
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.032 · DOI
- Berding N., 1997, Clonal improvement of sugarcane based on selection for moisture content: fact or fiction, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 19, 245
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00120-8 · DOI
- 10.1071/PP98041 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00002-9 · DOI
- Bull T.A., 2000, High density planting as an economic production strategy: (b) theory and trial results, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 22, 104
- 10.1071/PP98040 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00069-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/jexbot/48.313.1573 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00164-9 · DOI
- Cox M.C., 2007, Benchmarking genetic gains from new cultivars in Queensland using productivity data, Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 26
- 10.1146/annurev.pp.39.060188.001411 · DOI
- Dale J.E., 1983, The Growth and Functioning of Leaves, 151
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01822.x · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040016x · DOI
- Fernandes A.C., 1985, Distribution patterns of Brix and fiber in the primary stalk of sugarcane, Sugarcane, 5, 8
- 10.1071/CP08311 · DOI
- Garside A.L., 1997, Intensive Sugarcane production, Meeting the Challenges beyond 2000, 103
- Gifford R.M., 1974, A comparison of potential photosynthesis, productivity and yield of plant species with differing photosynthetic metabolism, Functional Plant Biology, 1, 107, 10.1071/PP9740107 · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1985, Factors affecting the performance of varieties released recently in the South African sugar industry, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 59, 5
- 10.1080/02571862.1991.10634587 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-4290(94)90051-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-4290(95)00021-H · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1995, Climate and water as constraints to production in the South African Sugar Industry, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 69, 55
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.018 · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 2004, Can lodging be controlled through irrigation?, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 26
- 10.1071/AR07167 · DOI
- 10.1071/CP08272 · DOI
- 10.1071/CP09262 · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1993, Predicting yield responses to irrigation of sugarcane using a growth model and field records, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 67, 66
- 10.1016/0378-4290(86)90043-2 · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1986, Effect of water stress on growth, leaf resistance and canopy temperature in field‐grown sugarcane, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 60, 156
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1988, Effect of water stress on sugarcane stalk growth and quality, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 52, 140
- 10.1071/CP11128 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00044-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023 · DOI
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 2002, Plant extension, soil water extraction and water stress in sugarcane, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 24, 242
- Inman‐Bamber N.G., 1989, Models of dry matter accumulation by sugarcane, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 63, 212
- 10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183X001500050017x · DOI
- Jackson P.A., 2005, Progress and prospects in genetic improvement in sucrose accumulation, Field Crops Research, 92, 277
- Jackson P.A., 2000, The relative importance of cane yield and traits affecting CCS in sugarcane varieties, Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 22, 23
- Keating B.A., 1999, Modelling sugarcane production systems. I. Description and validation of the APSIM Sugarcane module, Field Crops Research, 61, 253, 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00167-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400050018x · DOI
- Kozlowski T.T., 1968, Water Deficits and Plant Growth, 1
- Kropff M.J., 1997, Intensive Sugarcane production, Meeting the Challenges Beyond 2000, 17
- Langer R.H.M., 1963, Tillering in herbage grasses. A review article, Herbage Abstracts, 33, 141
- 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00087-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2008.06.004 · DOI
- McGlinchey M.G., 2010, Using computer simulation models to aid replant planning and harvest decisions in irrigated sugarcane, Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 27
- Moore P.H., 1997, Intensive Sugarcane Production, Meeting the Challenges Beyond 2000, 141
- 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040017x · DOI
- Muchow R.C., 1997, Intensive Sugarcane production, Meeting the Challenges beyond 2000, 37
- 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00042-1 · DOI
- Olivier F., 2003, Water use efficiency of irrigated sugarcane as affected by row spacing and variety, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 77, 347
- 10.1093/jexbot/53.366.123 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.025 · DOI
- Penning de Vries F.W.T, 1982, Simulation of Plant Growth and Crop Production, 9
- 10.1016/0378-3774(90)90058-7 · DOI
- 10.1071/PP98042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00065-8 · DOI
- Robertson M.J., 1996, Sugarcane: Research Toward Efficient and Sustainable Production, 84
- 10.1071/A98051 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-4290(96)00041-X · DOI
- Rostron H., 1972, The effects of age and time of harvest on the productivity of irrigated sugarcane, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 46, 142
- 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900010023x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60914-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00118-1 · DOI
- Singels A., 2002, The effect of row spacing on an irrigated plant crop of sugarcane variety NCo376, Proceedings of the South African Society of Sugar Technologists, 76, 94
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.028 · DOI
- 10.1071/AR02044 · DOI
- 10.4141/cjps82-128 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05005-4 · DOI
- van Dillewijn C, 1952, Botany of Sugarcane, 371
- 10.1093/jxb/erq144 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.03.003 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sexton, J., Everingham, Y., & Inman-Bamber, G. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.05.014 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Inman‐Bamber, G.
- Venue
- Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-06
- Pages
- 579-600
- OpenAlex
- W1536780380
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
- Keywords
- cane yield, photosynthetically active radiation, photosynthesis, sucrose translocation, biomass yield, crop models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review