The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applied Mixed Models in Medicine
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Random-effects models allow for estimation of between-person differences (ie, group effects) in within-person slopes (ie, change trajectories in secondary outcomes) and are the preferred methods for analysing clinical trial data.50”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476
Long-term kidney outcomes of semaglutide in obesity and cardiovascular disease in the SELECT trial
Colhoun, H. M., Lingvay, I., Brown, P. M., Deanfield, J., Brown-Frandsen, K., Kahn, S. E., Plutzky, J., Node, K., Parkhomenko, A., Rydén, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03015-5 · Cited by 238
Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2019) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w · Cited by 264
Tapiainen, T., Koivusaari, P., Brinkac, L. M., Lorenzi, H., Salo, J., Renko, M., Pruikkonen, H., Pokka, T. M.-L., Li, W., Nelson, K., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46964-5 · Cited by 181
Röver, C., Bender, R., Dias, S., Schmid, C. H., Schmidli, H., Sturtz, S., Weber, S., & Friede, T. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1475 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, H., & Prescott, R.
- ORCID
- Prescott, Robin
- Venue
- Wiley eBooks
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-12
- OpenAlex
- W2500762131
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- mixed models, longitudinal data, repeated measures, random effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
