The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Varieties of Capitalism
Abstract
Scholarship on varieties of capitalism (VofC) explores the ways in which the institutions structuring the political economy affect patterns of economic performance or policy making and the distribution of well‐being. Contesting the claim that there is one best route to superior economic performance, a number of schemas have been proposed to explain why countries have often been able to secure substantial rates of growth in different ways, often with relatively egalitarian distributions of income. Prominent among them is a VofC analysis focused on the developed democracies that distinguishes liberal and coordinated market economies according to the ways in which firms coordinate their endeavors. On the basis of institutional complementarities among subspheres of the political economy, it suggests that the institutional structure of the political economy confers comparative institutional advantages, notably for radical and incremental innovation, which explains why economies have not converged in the context of globalization. Although this framework is contested, it has inspired new research on many subjects, including the basis for innovation, the determinants of social policy, the grounds for international negotiation, and the character of institutional change. In this issue area, there is promising terrain for further research into the origins of varieties of capitalism, the factors that drive institutional change in the political economy, how institutional arrangements in the subspheres of the political economy interact with one another, the normative underlay for capitalism, and the effects of varieties of capitalism on multiple dimensions of well‐being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity
Thelen, K. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107282001 · Cited by 1,065
Cited by
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins
Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.46.2.285 · Cited by 3,220
Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375 · Cited by 920
McCleary, R. M., & Barro, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.20.2.49 · Cited by 894
Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry
Sturgeon, T., Van Biesebroeck, J., & Gereffi, G. (2008) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn007 · Cited by 885
Emerging multinationals from mid‐range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets
Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01085.x · Cited by 756
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, P. A.
- Venue
- Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W1549592375
- Cited by
- 1,389
- References
- 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varieties of Capitalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0377
- The paper
- Hall, P. A. (2015). Varieties of Capitalism. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.