Cited by 124Academic Writing and PublishingMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The Structure and Conduct of a Narrative Literature Review

Pautasso, Marco·2019·A Guide to the Scientific Career

Abstract

Writing a narrative literature review requires careful planning. This chapter summarizes some key steps in reviewing the literature. First, a team needs to be formed. Second, a topic needs to be chosen. This needs to be relevant to the author's research/teaching interests and a well-defined issue. Third, a thorough search strategy using a variety of pertinent keywords and databases is needed. Inspecting papers cited in and citing the retrieved material is helpful. Fourth, efficient reading is required. My advice is to start taking notes alongside the literature search. Fifth, a decision is needed on whether to write a mini- or a full review. Sixth, whilst revising and restructuring the first draft, it is important to keep the review focused, but to make it interesting for a broad audience. Seventh, a good review of the literature does not just list the main achievements in the field but is also critical, consistent, and objective. Eighth, the sections of the review need to be linked in a logical way. Ninth, it is helpful to obtain peer feedback on the manuscript before submitting it for peer-review. Finally, dissemination of the review on social media and online repositories can help increase the review's audience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118907283.ch31

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pautasso, M.
Affiliations
European Food Safety Authority (IT)
Corresponding author
Pautasso, Marco
Venue
A Guide to the Scientific Career
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-18
Pages
299-310
OpenAlex
W2980655164
Cited by
124
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
literature review writing, literature search strategies, critical review, peer feedback, peer review, research dissemination, writing process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review