Systems Methods for Developmental Research
Abstract
Abstract In this chapter a broad variety of aspects of dynamic systems approaches is discussed, including heuristic descriptions of methodological issues, experimental designs, mathematical models associated with such approaches and, in particular, statistical methods to fit dynamic systems models to appropriate empirical data. The authors start with a breakthrough in statistical modeling that has fundamental consequences for developmental science. It is shown that a general mathematical theory, called ergodic theory, puts dynamic systems approaches at the center of statistical modeling in developmental science. A general dynamic factor model is presented, which captures most of the statistical models that are appropriate in linear dynamic systems approaches. It is shown how specific variants of dynamic factor models enable critical tests of key characteristics of developmental processes. The chapter continues with an extensive discussion of the implications of nonlinear dynamic systems approaches for an important topic in developmental science: the analysis of stage‐wise development. Special emphasis is given here to neural network models and dynamic systems models based on catastrophe theory. The chapter closes with a heuristic presentation of mathematical control theory of dynamic systems as an important tool for optimal guidance of developmental processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H∞, and Nonlinear Approaches
Simon, D. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470045345 · Cited by 4,875 · see citing works
Birkhoff, G. D. (1931) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.17.2.656 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Self-citationA dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth.
van Geert, P. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.3 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P. M., & Ernst, T. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20259 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup>
Cantor, P., Osher, D., Berg, J., Steyer, L., & Rose, T. (2019) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
- Authors
- Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03-23
- Pages
- 1-31
- OpenAlex
- W1563876978
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- dynamic systems approach, developmental science, ergodic theory, dynamic factor models, nonlinear dynamical systems, neural network model, catastrophe theory, control theory, developmental processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review