Cited by 80Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMental Health Research TopicsControl Systems and Identification

Systems Methods for Developmental Research

Molenaar, Peter C. M., Nesselroade, John R.·2015·Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science

Abstract

Abstract In this chapter a broad variety of aspects of dynamic systems approaches is discussed, including heuristic descriptions of methodological issues, experimental designs, mathematical models associated with such approaches and, in particular, statistical methods to fit dynamic systems models to appropriate empirical data. The authors start with a breakthrough in statistical modeling that has fundamental consequences for developmental science. It is shown that a general mathematical theory, called ergodic theory, puts dynamic systems approaches at the center of statistical modeling in developmental science. A general dynamic factor model is presented, which captures most of the statistical models that are appropriate in linear dynamic systems approaches. It is shown how specific variants of dynamic factor models enable critical tests of key characteristics of developmental processes. The chapter continues with an extensive discussion of the implications of nonlinear dynamic systems approaches for an important topic in developmental science: the analysis of stage‐wise development. Special emphasis is given here to neural network models and dynamic systems models based on catastrophe theory. The chapter closes with a heuristic presentation of mathematical control theory of dynamic systems as an important tool for optimal guidance of developmental processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy117

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-23
Pages
1-31
OpenAlex
W1563876978
Cited by
80
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
Keywords
dynamic systems approach, developmental science, ergodic theory, dynamic factor models, nonlinear dynamical systems, neural network model, catastrophe theory, control theory, developmental processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review