Cited by 416Resilience and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

Resilience in Development: Progress and Transformation

Masten, Ann S., Cicchetti, Dante·2016·Developmental Psychopathology

Abstract

This chapter reviews origins and progress in resilience science, with an emphasis on progress over the past decade in theory, findings, and translational applications for strategic intervention. In alignment with prevailing concepts in developmental systems theory, human resilience is defined as the potential or manifested capacity of an individual to adapt successfully through multiple processes to experiences that threaten his or her function, survival, or development. Resilience pathways, developmental cascades, gene‐environment interactions, and other models salient in current resilience theory are delineated, including new approaches to testing resilience‐related processes in such models. Findings on promotive and protective effects are discussed, focusing on widely replicated adaptive processes that develop in children, their families, other relationships, and key contexts as children develop. Resilience processes involving families, schools, peers, culture, and other socioecological systems are highlighted. Genetic and neurobiological processes are reviewed as a growingedge of resilience science. Intervention research based on resilience theory is discussed, together with translational implications for practice and policy based on the expanding body of knowledge about resilience processes. The chapter concludes with a review of enduring controversies, a summary of progress, and directions for the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy406

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resilience is not a fixed trait that an individual categorically possesses or lacks, but rather it emerges through coaction with contextual, supportive, and relational factors.

    “a recognition that resilience is not a fixed trait that an individual categorically possesses or lacks, but rather it emerges through coaction with contextual, supportive, and relational factors.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 416 · Cited by 416

Authors
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-10
Pages
1-63
OpenAlex
W2296566626
Cited by
416
References
416
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
resilience, developmental systems theory, developmental cascades, gene-environment interaction, promoting factors, protective factors, adaptive processes, children, family, schools, peer relationships, culture, social-ecological systems, genetic processes, neurobiology, resilience interventions, translational research, policy implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review