Resilience in Development: Progress and Transformation
Abstract
This chapter reviews origins and progress in resilience science, with an emphasis on progress over the past decade in theory, findings, and translational applications for strategic intervention. In alignment with prevailing concepts in developmental systems theory, human resilience is defined as the potential or manifested capacity of an individual to adapt successfully through multiple processes to experiences that threaten his or her function, survival, or development. Resilience pathways, developmental cascades, gene‐environment interactions, and other models salient in current resilience theory are delineated, including new approaches to testing resilience‐related processes in such models. Findings on promotive and protective effects are discussed, focusing on widely replicated adaptive processes that develop in children, their families, other relationships, and key contexts as children develop. Resilience processes involving families, schools, peers, culture, and other socioecological systems are highlighted. Genetic and neurobiological processes are reviewed as a growingedge of resilience science. Intervention research based on resilience theory is discussed, together with translational implications for practice and policy based on the expanding body of knowledge about resilience processes. The chapter concludes with a review of enduring controversies, a summary of progress, and directions for the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resilience is not a fixed trait that an individual categorically possesses or lacks, but rather it emerges through coaction with contextual, supportive, and relational factors.
“a recognition that resilience is not a fixed trait that an individual categorically possesses or lacks, but rather it emerges through coaction with contextual, supportive, and relational factors.”
From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context<sup>1</sup> (2019) · cites this paper as Masten & Cicchetti, 2016
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 416 · Cited by 416
- Authors
- Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Developmental Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-02-10
- Pages
- 1-63
- OpenAlex
- W2296566626
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 416
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- resilience, developmental systems theory, developmental cascades, gene-environment interaction, promoting factors, protective factors, adaptive processes, children, family, schools, peer relationships, culture, social-ecological systems, genetic processes, neurobiology, resilience interventions, translational research, policy implications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review