Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Literature, Culture, and AestheticsCultural, Social, and Media StudiesMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fandom, Negotiation, and Participatory Culture

Jenkins, Henry·2018·A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies
DOI 10.1002/9781119237211.ch1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using tools and frameworks for cultural studies, this chapter explores fandom as a form of participatory culture, one which facilitates the social negotiation of the meaning and value of popular texts, enables grassroots creative responses, and provides a context for debates about issues of representation, diversity, and inclusion. This chapter explores why it remains meaningful to talk about audiences and their activities even in a networked society which has theoretically blurred the boundaries between consumers and producers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119237211.ch1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1080/10714420701715365 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4324/9780203321454 · DOI
  3. Banet‐Weiser Sarah, 2014, Participations: Dialogues on the Participatory Promise of Contemporary Culture and Politics Forum PART I: CREATIVITY, International Journal of Communication, 8, 1069
  4. Benkler Yochai, 2007, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
  5. Brooker Will, 2003, The Audience Studies Reader
  6. Butler Martin, 2016, Precarious Alliances: Cultures and Participation in Print and Other Media, 19
  7. Butsch Richard, 2011, The Handbook of Media Audiences, 149
  8. 10.1002/9781444340525.ch9 · DOI
  9. Dayan Daniel, 2005, Audiences and Publics: Where Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere, 43
  10. 10.7551/mitpress/10248.001.0001 · DOI
  11. Hall Stuart, 1980, Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, 128
  12. Hall Stuart, 1981, People's History and Socialist Theory, 227
  13. Hall Stuart, 1992, Black Popular Culture: A Project, 21
  14. Hellekson Karen, 2006, Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet
  15. 10.2307/j.ctt20p58d6 · DOI
  16. Jenkins Henry, 1992, Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture
  17. Jenkins Henry, 2016, Precarious Alliances: Cultures and Participation in Print and Other Media, 33
  18. Jenkins Henry, 2013, Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture
  19. Jenkins Henry, 2015, Participatory Culture in a Networked Era
  20. 10.7551/mitpress/8435.001.0001 · DOI
  21. Livingstone Sonia, 2005, Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere, 17
  22. Lopez Lori Kido, 2012, Fan‐Activists and the Politics of Race in The Last Airbender, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 15, 431, 10.1177/1367877911422862 · DOI
  23. Merrick Helen, 2009, The Secret Feminist Cabal: A Cultural History of Science Fiction Feminisms
  24. Morley David, 1980, The Nationwide Audience
  25. Rabinowitz Peter J., 1985, The Turn of the Glass Key: Popular Fiction as Reading Strategy, Critical Inquiry, 11, 418, 10.1086/448296 · DOI
  26. Russ Joanna, 1983, How to Suppress Women's Writing
  27. Saler Michael, 2011, As If: Modern Enchantment and the Literary Prehistory of Virtual Reality
  28. Scott Suzanne, 2009, Repackaging Fan Culture: The Regifting Economy of Ancillary Content Models, Transformative Works and Cultures, 3
  29. Scott Suzanne, 2015, The Hawkeye Initiative: Pinning Down Transformative Feminisms in Comicbook Culture Through Superhero Crossplay Fan Art, Cinema Journal, 55, 150, 10.1353/cj.2015.0075 · DOI
  30. Shirky Clay.2005. “Institutions Vs. Collaboration.” Speech at TEDGlobal conference inOxford UK July 14.http://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_on_institutions_versus_collaboration.
  31. Stanfill Mel, 2011, Doing Fandom, (Mis)Doing Whiteness: Heteronormativity, Racialization, and the Discursive Construction of Fandom, Transformative Works and Cultures, 8
  32. Tulloch John, 2000, Watching Television Audiences: Cultural Theories & Methods
  33. Turk Tisha, 2014, Fan Work: Labor, Worth, and Participation in Fandom's Gift Economy, Transformative Works and Cultures, 15
  34. Williams Raymond, 2011, The Everyday Life Reader, 91
  35. Zubernis Lynn, 2012, Fandom at the Crossroads: Celebration, Shame, and Fan/Producer Relationships

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, H.
Corresponding author
Jenkins, Henry
ORCID
Jenkins, Henry
Venue
A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-25
Pages
11-26
DOI
10.1002/9781119237211.ch1
OpenAlex
W2796147628
Cited by
121
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Literature, Culture, and Aesthetics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural, Social, and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
fandom, participatory culture, popular culture, audience research, negotiation of meaning, representation, diversity and inclusion, network society, popular texts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.